4 ms·
> For starters I'm 1 person, so the market is not O. And I know of others, and I know I'm not alone Of all the people you interacted with in any way, shape or
by orf 2y ago
> For starters I'm 1 person, so the market is not O. And I know of others, and I know I'm not alone
Of all the people you interacted with in any way, shape or form this year, what percentage of those would benefit from this?
It rounds to 0, assuming you’re not a shut-in
- grahamj 2y agoIf they're a shut-in it definitely rounds to zero
- kruxigt 2y ago[dead]
- worthless-trash 2y agoEverything rounds to zero on a big enough scale.
- ksp-atlas 2y agoWouldn't any percentage below 50% round to zero?
- hilbert42 2y agoThe point you are making is irrelevant as it has nothing to do with my point which is what I want as features on my phone. Whether manufacturers make them or how many other people may want the same as I do is a separate issue. What phone do you use now and are you satisfied with it? Tell me that and I may be able to then figure where you are coming from. BTW, read my comment to f6v.
- orf 2y agoYou asked: > How can you say that, where are your figures/stats/evidence? I responded with: > just look outside in the real world? That’s totally relevant to you asking why no mass-market phones support increasingly niche features that ~0% of the population need or want, and you expanding on this by saying “me and one other person I know want this”…
- hilbert42 2y agoRead my reply to david-gpu. I can't make it any clearer, sorry I don't speak Klingon.
- orf 2y ago> The point I put forward is what I and a small select section of the market wants as features Or > “Because the population of people that would actually use that functionality rounds to approximately 0." > How can you say that, where are your figures/stats/evidence? Pick one