oreilles

10 ms·

91.
by oreilles 5y ago
Placing the url at the bottom is brilliant UI wise considering the height of the average smartphone nowadays. And anyway they made this an option for those who wouldn't like it. The “mess" that was discussed in your second link (t
92.
by oreilles 5y ago
Except contrary to any other landlord, the government doesn't expect to earn money but to have a balanced budget. This is why medical expanses are much higher in the US than in any European country. This is why all basic necessities sh
93.
by oreilles 5y ago
This isn't a problem with diversity. Everybody knows how to pronounce Malcom X. And it's not like just because a google engineer was black that he was like "oh, let's try and see if Malcom X is pronounced correctly becau
94.
by oreilles 5y ago
You never owned an iPhone. You can't read the OS source, you can't install other OS, you can't sideload apps, you can't repair it yourself, you can't buy official spare parts, and you cannot even reuse the parts of
95.
by oreilles 5y ago
Your phone is the camera. It can already read and write everything that's inside because that's how an operating system works. There is zero breach of privacy unless the result of the scan are sent without your consent. Just lik
96.
by oreilles 5y ago
> This device could be capable of seeing or hearing anything that happens in your entire home This device is your smartphone. It can already watch and listen everything you do. It can already read and write everything that's inside
97.
by oreilles 5y ago
Apple does not spy on your device. They only get information about the data you agree to sending it to them by using their cloud services. It's nothing remotely close to the surveillance we are talking about here.
98.
by oreilles 5y ago
No it is not, as zero information is sent to Apple unless you use their cloud service. Now if you consider that a cloud syncing service is spyware because it sends information to the provider, I don't know what to say.
99.
by oreilles 5y ago
> Apple has repeatedly assured its customers that the devices they buy are theirs That is definetly not true. Apple has always been anti-ownership. By making the OS closed source, preventing installation of other OS, preventing sideloadi
100.
by oreilles 5y ago
If Apple wanted to make the iPhone a sandwich, we could eat it. But until then you can't. Apple could read your whole phone content and send it to governments without your consent if they wanted to, on device-scanning or not. Util they
101.
by oreilles 5y ago
Except your phone is not a snitch. Snitching is sending informations to a third party, which your phone doesn't do, unless you explicitly accept it by using iCloud syncing. You're basically upset that your operating system can rea
102.
by oreilles 5y ago
If your phone were to detect illicit pictures, nothing would happen unless you send them those files to Apple, in which case they would have know that you had them anyway. There is nothing even remotely close to the truth with saying that y
103.
by oreilles 5y ago
It's not Apple scanning your device. It's your device scanning itself, and you sharing the results of those scans to Apple with iCloud if you decide to use it. Don't want Apple to see your data ? Just don't send it to
104.
by oreilles 5y ago
> "self-reporting to the authorities" That's 100% not what the feature is about. People need to stop spreading this nonsense. Apple only get the result of the scans when the files are send to them via iCloud, then they,
105.
by oreilles 5y ago
Regulation exists to prevent doing things the bad way, not to prevent doing things altogether.
106.
by oreilles 5y ago
It is non-existent atm unfortunately.
107.
by oreilles 5y ago
My god, if you can make an e-ink display work it would be an insta-buy for me.