Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ordu
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
38 ms
·
511.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
Yeah, you are right, it is not cool. How about to eat your fork? Can microbiota digest iron?
512.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
I wonder why an artificial stimulation leads to fatique? Is it due to a lack of a feedback from a muscle? Biology devised quite an ingenious muscles consisting of several bundles of fibers, and nervous system distribute work between somehow
513.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
If we are on this topic then we need to discuss a genetically modified gut microbiota. We do not need to edit genetically ourselves for some pityful vitamins. Microbiota could give us all we want. It could enable us to digest plastic, so we
514.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> They're saving 12%, on the best days. The average is 3.8%. According to the article it is 12 tons/day on the best days and 3.3 ton/day average. 14% average with 37% max for reduction of greenhouse gases emissions.
515.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
(2) wouldn't work. People agree with propaganda not because they think it is telling the truth. On the contrary, they agree with propaganda and then they start believing it. I'd say it is more like a social adaptation, you need to
516.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
Is it possible to build a macro simulation of the world of quantum mechanics? And then macro-macro... BTW I think it is not possible but what is the difference between GoL and QM that makes QM so narrowly bound to a nanoscale.
517.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
Well... if we wrap around without meddling with time, it will be impossible. On the lowest level cells are switching much more frequently than on the highest level. But if we allow ourselves to bend time, then probably... It would be like y
518.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> the audience booed louder when the word disrupted was used as a term of praise Yeah, it is often goes like "lets disrupt and see if we will be able to rip some benefits from the chaos after the disruption". And the fun thin
519.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
Maybe it is me, but it seems more like a parody showing how not to do things. I believe the easiest way to do it is something like: mypoint.coords().map(|x| x * x).sum().sqrt() Instead there are dozens of lines of code adding some
520.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
When I see people being yelled at for their non-standard theories in internet it mostly boils down to them ignoring (let's call it) the structure of a scientific knowledge, when they just pick from a textbooks statements they like, rej
521.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> If it was e.g. a Chinese or Russian company that had merged with Boeing, kicked out the engineering management and started dismantling the company from within, I think it would have been viewed as an act of hostility, but when domesti
522.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> Surely, for example, multiple processors are no help to TeX But TeX was designed to run on a single CPU-core, so no surprise here. I wonder what TeX could become if all Knuth had at the time a multicore machine with cores managing ma
523.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> In the dev tools I added the following to the body to make it readable For cases when you don't agree with styles there is Reader Mode. Your way works also, but Reader Mode just simplier, it is just one click away.
524.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
The booster puncturing spheres of clouds on a way back was awesome also.
525.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> the actual experiments failed to build trust in the experimentees Psychological experiments involve trickery very often, because they need test subjects to be unaware of what experiments is trying to measure. I expect the most of sub
526.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> I'm an idiot. Psychologically speaking it is not a right attitude. Martin Seligman[1] would call it a personal, pervasive and permanent causal explanation which is worse than bad. > Very tired. Much better. Still personal a
527.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> the await keyword will run it asynchronously? From the point of view of print_point await executes the thunk synchronously, print_point execution stops and awaits for print to finish it work. But a callee of print_point might want it
528.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> I know it sounds nitpicky, but to me all keywords should be obviously pronounceable, so something like "func" instead of "fn" would be mandatory. Keywords only? How about function names like strspn or sbrk? And ho
529.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
It it what happens when you try to make an universal API for any thinkable and unthinkable use-case.
530.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> reaching a blistering 387 mph (623 km/h) > The previous record holder [...] can hit a top speed of 375 mph (630 km/h). 387->623 375->630 Hard to say which way the reported coverted units when made the mistake, but if
531.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
Just updating a compiler could break workflows for historical versions of the code. It is unavoidable. But it is easier with build flags if you use VCS: these flags could be different for different versions.
532.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> all kinds of problems that you would never in a thousand years be able to handle with mere talk Not "all kinds of problems" but very specific kinds of problems which is possible to formalize into a math language. How would
533.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> the modern civilized world could only emerge —for better or for worse— when Western Europe could free itself from the fetters of medieval scholasticism I can propose an alternate view of things. Not that I'm going to argue that
534.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
> is there a viable way to slow down or speed up orbits of rocky planets? You can fly something massive near a target planet, while using some kind of engine to keep a distance. Gravity will do the rest. It may take some time of course
535.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
Could video camera be damaged by a direct imaging of Sun?
536.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
The point of interview is not to be objective or something like, the point is to maximize chances for a good hire. Your chosen example is the one of several, and don't forget it is an hour of talking. No one decides on this answer alon
537.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
What the difference? Do you think people pretend to be interested in a product when marketing is good? I think they become genuinely interested. People pretend when there are some benefits from pretending, social or monetary or whatever. I
538.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
It changes. Monty's behaviour influenced by his knowledge were the car is. He is leaking information. It is a probabilistic leak: if you first picked by a chance the only door with a car, then Monty is free to open any of remaining doo
539.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
Yeah, now you can see when a site wants to sell your data to Google.
540.
▲
by
ordu
3y ago
I would advise to presume that the author knows exactly what he wants to say, particularly that it was a deliberate decision to choose socially awkward form for a message "we are tired of being told we're socialy awkward idiots&qu
More ›