option

7 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by option 2y ago

   you can have CSAM on your smartphone, why smartphone makers aren’t required to constantly monitor your phone for it? /s
2. 62.▲
   by option 2y ago

   don’t you have an answer now?
3. 63.▲
   by option 2y ago

   Telegram is used by hundreds of millions in Europe and Middle East
4. 64.▲
   by option 2y ago

   she is good too. but musk did 0->1 work. She did everything else
5. 65.▲
   by option 2y ago

   I get a laugh too. Also, I love what he has done with Twitter, though name change to X was stupid.
6. 66.▲
   by option 2y ago

   losers hate successful people. it is called jealousy, and sadly a part of human nature
7. 67.▲
   by option 2y ago

   look at track record. Not at tweets. He has delivered more than anyone else. By far and in several areas.
8. 68.▲
   by option 2y ago

   we need more than one spacex.
9. 69.▲
   by option 2y ago

   Yes, we need multiple providers and the proper way to do that is not by bailing out poor designs by incumbents. Instead, we should be setting lucrative incentives for new entrants.
10. 70.▲
    Interact with Nvidia's 340B Model(build.nvidia.com)

    4 points by option 2y ago|0 comments
11. 71.▲
    by option 2y ago

    3 models are included: base, instruct, and reward. All under license permitting synthetic data generation and commercial use.
12. 72.▲
    by option 2y ago

    shame on CA senate for being either too corrupt, too stupid or both for passing this. Congratulations to MSFT/OpenAI and Google for successful regulatory capture. Sorry future startups in this field - I guess when there are enough comp
13. 73.▲
    by option 2y ago

    feel the AGI
14. 74.▲
    by option 2y ago

    I agree that Gwynne should be getting more praise than she gets now. But Elon is phenomenally good at getting from 0 to something that works. And colonizing Mars has many, many various needs beyond Starship that have never been done before.
15. 75.▲
    by option 2y ago

    I wish Elon abandons US culture wars, Tesla and focus on this. Think about it, if (and this is a giant if) he successfully pushes humans to become multiplanetary species by colonizing Mars, he will objectively be the most important human be
16. 76.▲
    by option 2y ago

    and if you do nothing or fail to execute for good reasons you do not matter
17. 77.▲
    by option 2y ago

    tell me. who target user base is?
18. 78.▲
    by option 2y ago

    I have a simpler explanation though - Sam reversed a decision to dedicate 20% of OAI compute to superalignment team.
19. 79.▲
    by option 2y ago

    I'll say it again - the one who was irreplaceable at OpenAI is Ilya, not Sam.
20. 80.▲
    by option 2y ago

    I’ll take American values over CCP any day
21. 81.▲
    by option 2y ago

    Try asking their "chat" variants about topics sensetive to CCP, like what has happened on Tiananmen square. Same for Baichan models. What other values and biases have been RLHFed there and for what purpose?
22. 82.▲
    by option 2y ago

    I'd say medieval icelanders did everything before industrial technology
23. 83.▲
    by option 2y ago

    bingo
24. 84.▲
    by option 2y ago

    nothing wrong with knowing how to make a bomb or heroin. Obviously wrong making either for nefarious reasons but one can imagine legitimate reasons too.
25. 85.▲
    by option 2y ago

    Controversial, but right move by US.
26. 86.▲
    by option 2y ago

    This is fantastic news. This will make USA even more innovative.
27. 87.▲
    by option 3y ago

    I am not sure why you are being down voted. Track record matters.
28. 88.▲
    by option 3y ago

    Not really. Open source and proprietary models aren't that far from them. They don't have moat. Their main advantage have been people and aleady we see entire Anthropic spinoff, Sutskever absent, Karpathy leave, who is next?
29. 89.▲
    by option 3y ago

    It's not close. Long tail is probably as hard for LLMs as it is for search.
30. 90.▲
    by option 3y ago

    You should replace all + with * in your formula.