Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
option
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
63 ms
·
751.
▲
by
option
7y ago
more importantly than a good writer, he is great scientist and scientific leader. It takes a special person to create and/or lead the growth of a team/lab/institution to world-class level. Somewhat reminds me of M. Kelly from
752.
▲
by
option
7y ago
I’ve just finished reading “DNA: the story of a genetic revolution” by J. Watson, Nobel prize winner, who was a long time director of Cold Spring Harbor laboratory (number 1 on that list). It is an awesome and very easy overview of the fiel
753.
▲
by
option
7y ago
we have a somewhat popular open source project on TF 1.x However, we decided that for it’s successor we would go with Pytorch. Because going from TF 1.x to TF 2.x seemed to be almost as much hassle as just going to Pytorch from TF and Pyto
754.
▲
by
option
7y ago
Bay Area is not a ghost town, it is already overcrowded
755.
▲
by
option
7y ago
I’m afraid not everyone understands your sarcasm here :)
756.
▲
by
option
7y ago
the West is being murdered by populists
757.
▲
by
option
7y ago
I don’t understand why all the growth need to happen in this place and this place alone. Wouldn’t it be nice if “good” jobs overflow SV and appear in other places? (kind of happening to Austin, Boulder, NY, etc.) And people who already live
758.
▲
by
option
7y ago
A much better solution would be: 1) open more large centers in other states. having a single supercenter with good jobs in one place only is bad for that place and country as a whole 2) encourage and promote remote work
759.
▲
by
option
7y ago
my point is that because of fear of nuclear no further research was done. It is now super hard to even get enough material for a rector/battery such as the one on Curiosity
760.
▲
by
option
7y ago
yes, we should explore (and eventually exploit) all forms of propulsion and decide between them based on physics, not politics
761.
▲
by
option
7y ago
that’s why we need regulatory bodies and, yes, tariffs which should factor all those additional costs: to environment, human rights, etc.
762.
▲
by
option
7y ago
I was renting a 2018 car on vacation with apple car play and was very pleasantly surprised how good experience is. For comparison, I own the same maxed-out but 2017 car without a carplay. Apple Carplay is so much better then car manufactur
763.
▲
by
option
7y ago
every person who finished some school should understand that speaking about motion without reference frame is meaningless. Is such frame is proper to Earth (yeah, go google what proper frame is) then the Sun does revolve around Earth. If th
764.
▲
by
option
7y ago
yes, it is overcrowded. I lived in European capital which is much more densely populated. I still remember people jams in subway during rush hours with horror
765.
▲
by
option
7y ago
Please explain to me how do I benefit when the taxes I pay to live in my house go up
766.
▲
by
option
7y ago
this is not a tax on being poor, this is a tax on everyone. It is also to be used by everyone, so why only property owners should pay?
767.
▲
by
option
7y ago
you can’t just build more houses without infrastructure. And even with it, people already living here will and do oppose building more (and, alas, they have a right to their opinion) We should not have job singularities like Bay Area or NY,
768.
▲
by
option
7y ago
also people tend to ignore that quality of life correlates with energy consumed. We not only need our energy clean, we need much more of it
769.
▲
by
option
7y ago
sorry, my superpowers are secret
770.
▲
by
option
7y ago
as a personal anecdote: when people in US hear that I grew up near Chernobyl they semi-jokingly assumed: I glow in the dark, have six fingers, have a tail, etc. (of course it is all not true :) My point is: continued demonizing of nuclear i
771.
▲
Why HBO’s Chernobyl gets nuclear so wrong
(forbes.com)
32 points
by
option
7y ago
|
5 comments
772.
▲
by
option
7y ago
Routinely happens to us. We made an offer (full time) to a graduating PhD student (US university) from one of the famous deep learning professors (one of three who won a Turing award recently). The guy really like our team and project yet h
773.
▲
by
option
7y ago
for more samples go to the villages in the 30 km zone around Chernobyl- few people refused to evacuate and still live there at the very old age. Though I doubt they were ever exposed to such high levels of radiation as mentioned in the par
774.
▲
by
option
7y ago
My point is that nuclear is very safe, not that we should get rid of solar. People, think! I now live in Bay Area (very sunny place) and have solar on my house. Problem is that it covers at best 40% of my family’s (4 people) energy needs
775.
▲
by
option
7y ago
Regarding risk analysis - past track record is very important, especially when we have decades of it. Nuclear is very heavy regulated (and it should be) to prevent possible risks and new designs are very safe
776.
▲
by
option
7y ago
I grew up in a city (Slavutich) ~ 35 miles from Prioyat where it was evacuated. Radiation levels there two times smaller than in Manhattan ( which is still within the norm). Interestingly, some people refused to evacuate from nearby village
777.
▲
by
option
7y ago
Three anti-science lobbies dragging our world back into the dark ages: 1) anti-vaxxers 2) anti-nuclear 3) anti-GMO Let’s have a better public education before it is to late. I grew up near Chernobyl and my parents still work there. While n
778.
▲
by
option
7y ago
I think because of China’s approach to IP it is impossible for companies such as Microsoft to appear there.
779.
▲
by
option
7y ago
“those willing to give up a little bit of freedom to get a little bit of security deserve neither and will soon lose both”
780.
▲
by
option
7y ago
I remember how few years ago when TSLA
More ›