opt1c

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by opt1c 2y ago

   Hard to take Gary seriously calling out "outlandish claims" with "no substance" when he does the same thing in the opposite direction. Garbage article for clicks to pay for his lifestyle, now that he's grifted his w
2. 2.▲
   by opt1c 3y ago

   The section 174 changes were never intended to go into effect and are a byproduct of the bill review process by deficit hawks. A group in the House has called for changes but a bill hasn't made it out of committee yet.
3. 3.▲
   by opt1c 3y ago

   Actually, this has the most impact on startups that are close to break even or barely making profit. Let's say you make 1m ARR and have 5 software engineers at 200k/year. Prior to this tax code, you had $0 in profit to be taxed. W
4. 4.▲
   by opt1c 3y ago

   Imagine you're a small business that makes $1m ARR and you employ 5 software engineers at $200k per year. Your net income is 0. Prior to this change in the tax code, your software labor costs for that year would all count against your
5. 5.▲
   by opt1c 3y ago

   > It’s “underused” precisely because this feature is pretty much useless if you’re transcribing anything other than quick snippets of speech. I'm not sure why you're so dismissive when real-time transcription is an important us
6. 6.▲
   by opt1c 3y ago

   Microsoft has the most well-regarded security reputation amongst all cloud providers, it's the main reason why they were awarded the (since canceled) JEDI defense contract.