ontilt

4 ms·

1.
by ontilt 17y ago
I had success compiling a small-scale mixed Scala and Java project. scalac takes both .java and .scala sources without much fuss, in my experience. I think this is an area that's improved a lot since the author wrote about it.
2.
by ontilt 17y ago
I worked part-time at an ATDC company while I was in school at Tech. It was a scrappy startup with a lot of smart people. Overall, it was a very positive experience.
3.
by ontilt 17y ago
In this case, the reviewer is the very same Anand that built the respected site.
4.
by ontilt 17y ago
I've done a lot of webapp development in both Java and Rails. I would agree that the iteration cycle is shorter in Rails, but it's not as bad as your description makes it sound. If you have to redeploy a jar file as part of your developme
5.
by ontilt 17y ago
...not that there's anything wrong with that. I love the conciseness of Scala compared to Java and, even if it's not as elegant as a pure functional language, it seems like a great language for Getting Things Done.
6.
by ontilt 17y ago
I've been hacking in Java, Ruby, and Haskell for some time and when I started learning Scala, I quickly came to the conclusion that it was much more like Ruby than it is like Haskell.
7.
A monadic parser in JavaScript(labs.mudynamics.com)
20 points by ontilt 17y ago|3 comments
8.
by ontilt 17y ago
One solution could be to compare the downloaded file with an expected hash. That'd at least give you the opportunity to audit the code once. Something like... require ' http://example.com/somelib.rb , '7361c1132d2ada0e987080100cfff5c1645c
9.
by ontilt 18y ago
Something like this? http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/08/introducing-the-con...
10.
by ontilt 18y ago
iShowU HD might be a suitable replacement for Camtasia.