Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
onestone
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
Hard forks don't require any particular adoption percentage (unlike soft forks). The network simply splits in two chains. If one of the chains is obviously weaker, it usually dies quickly, as it's no longer economically viable. In
62.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
I disagree. The ability to reach consensus within a community does not necessarily imply centralization.
63.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
The quote was slightly off, apologies. I was quoting from memory, this was 3 years ago, and I can no longer edit the parent post. What he actually said was more like (translation): "Only someone who does not know how to turn on the com
64.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
A couple of examples from the first minute of the video: - A ridiculous example of "electronic voting" is presented - voters download ballot papers, fill them, then email or fax them back. This obviously sucks in multiple ways. Th
65.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
That YouTube video is full of logical fallacies and wrong claims. And even if such a verification is impossible, I don't think we should reject incremental improvements just because the result is not yet perfect.
66.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
He is a professor in Mathematics, and is often invited in popular TV shows as a supposed "expert" on elections, software, and politics in general.
67.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
That's awesome to hear. Many thanks for your efforts :)
68.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
I remember the CEO of Information Services JSC (the de-facto Bulgarian monopolist in governement software procurement), prof. Mihail Konstantinov, making the ridiculous claim on TV that "We can't release the source code of the ele
69.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
I get "502 Bad Gateway" after a long wait. An AppEngine issue?
70.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
Yes, a soft fork means consensus (majority) among miners. The developers (of Geth, Parity, cpp-ethereum, etc.) can propose the changes, but it's up to the miners whether to adopt them. Note that the Ethereum mining community is conside
71.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
FUD article. No (soft/hard) fork will happen without community consensus. Decentralization is not violated.
72.
▲
V8 Release 5.2
(v8project.blogspot.com)
6 points
by
onestone
10y ago
|
1 comments
73.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
SSHGuard has supported IPv6 for a long time.
74.
▲
Six nifty ES6 tricks
(2ality.com)
11 points
by
onestone
10y ago
|
0 comments
75.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
This is 9 years old. Linus has been happily writing C++ for some time now. For example: https://github.com/torvalds/subsurface/commit/56ed3f1c6119b9...
76.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
It's not a replacement at all, and has almost nothing in common with what is discussed here (except the name).
77.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
Yes.
78.
▲
JavaScript async/await implemented in V8
(chromium.googlesource.com)
509 points
by
onestone
10y ago
|
217 comments
79.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
It's not "proposed" in any relevant standards body, which is why this is also misleading.
80.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
The title is misleading. This isn't "proposed" in any relevant standards body. The project itself has a misleading name too, because it's not "standard" in any meaningful way, it's just a set of questionab
81.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
Because: 1) Bluebird is orders of magnitude faster and more memory-efficient than the current V8 native promises. Better native promises performance has been promised, but we are still waiting for it. 2) Bluebird is just as much standard-co
82.
▲
by
onestone
10y ago
No Pastafarianism? No Jediism?
83.
▲
by
onestone
11y ago
Comparing the two is completely meaningless. Ethereum's hash function (Ethash) is orders of magnitude more expensive than Bitcoin's SHA256. And also, it is ASIC-resistant.
84.
▲
by
onestone
11y ago
I think the current size is about 8 GB, not 40 GB, according to some recent posts (not running a node myself though).
85.
▲
by
onestone
11y ago
The same can be said for any public company.
86.
▲
by
onestone
11y ago
Uncertain. There could be other JS-related technologies below the cut - React, Redux, etc.
87.
▲
by
onestone
11y ago
To be fair, JS appears in 'loved' as Node.js.
88.
▲
by
onestone
11y ago
Thought this would be about the database (PostgreSQL precursor), turned out to be about an artist.
89.
▲
by
onestone
11y ago
Node.js Stable tries to follow the V8 version from latest stable Chrome quite closely (i.e. soon after the corresponding Chrome release), but occasionally a V8 version may be skipped, e.g. if it has problematic API changes. Node.js LTS bran
90.
▲
V8 Release 5.0 (upcoming)
(v8project.blogspot.com)
91 points
by
onestone
11y ago
|
31 comments
More ›