oneplane

54 ms·

541.
by oneplane 4y ago
You're missing your own point: none of those do what you described in your reply. I'm not talking about what is there, I'm talking about what you proposed should be there but isn't there. > If Apple is not competing o
542.
by oneplane 4y ago
Just look around you, do you see any critical mass on both the vendor or consumer side that does something the way you describe it? Every time someone comes up with some confident theory on markets or how things should be, or how bad the th
543.
by oneplane 4y ago
> This is defeatist, and ignores the second-order advantages of Free and Open Source software. That's both a gross misrepresentation of what I wrote, and completely wrong too. It doesn't matter how open your software sources ar
544.
by oneplane 4y ago
It's not a case of what is technically possible, it's a case of swimming against the current while you could also choose to swim somewhere else. If you choose something that is not what you want, and you also accept that the world
545.
by oneplane 4y ago
No, it doesn't. The case here is "buy a consumer device, get consumer results". If you were to expect different results, that doesn't mean that the world is wrong, it means that you bought something you didn't want.
546.
by oneplane 4y ago
Do you really think the general consumer knows about any technical details of the products they buy, and if they did, they would care enough to chose the less-comfortable option for no perceived gain? This almost never works, and I think yo
547.
by oneplane 4y ago
It seems the market isn't what you tink it is. At the same time, people also don't understand that the issue isn't what they think it is. There is a vocal minority on most of these things: - Powerusers and "learnt just e
548.
by oneplane 4y ago
So does older hardware, nothing was gained here.
549.
by oneplane 4y ago
> I like to know what data applications are sending or trying to send Good luck with that. Unless you are running a Commodore 64 it is unlikely that a single person can understand, inspect and make decisions on modern operating systems
550.
by oneplane 4y ago
Apple does: https://support.apple.com/en-gb/HT210060 But as others have written: this won't result in what you think it results in.
551.
by oneplane 4y ago
You actually have to opt in to this, but most people do because they don't care or understand what it is they are doing. In some cases, data shared features have to be re-opted-in during major OS upgrades (maybe because the processes t
552.
by oneplane 4y ago
I don't think you can trust any commercial baseband, period. They all have to adhere to complex radio standards, nobody wants to implement them because their design-by-committee stuff is boring/lame/hard/painful, so what
553.
by oneplane 4y ago
Considering the security UI layers control device access, I don't think AOSP or Android in general (with its many vendor customisations) is the most trustable. Knowing a PUK-code for a SIM card you own (and you can insert/hotswap)
554.
by oneplane 4y ago
Nobody here is going to do your homework for you. The Venn diagram of people that can and people that want to know but don't know how to do it is not going to have a lot of overlap.
555.
by oneplane 4y ago
Pretty much everything in UIKit, Cocoa etc. that uses native widgets use background frameworks and services that use things like searchpartyd, mediaanalysisd, knowledged, mds, touristd, and a whole bunch of other D's. That includes sea
556.
by oneplane 4y ago
You can disable it, just like any launchd process (similar to systemd units). The default is to have it automatic, and that default is part of the OS installation (which often means OS updates reset the defaults). To actually manage somethi
557.
by oneplane 4y ago
Well, that's not what you did, no matter your intentions. > Apple Has Begun Scanning Your Local Image Files Without Consent Begun? Nope, ancient process and system that has been there for many major releases. Consent? Definitely gav
558.
by oneplane 4y ago
If he can't do something like "strings /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/MediaAnalysis.framework/Versions/A/mediaanalysisd" I don't think any actual investigation of the binary or traff
559.
by oneplane 4y ago
Not for urlsessions with pinned keys, especially not on AMFI binaries you can't patch if you're not in development mode.
560.
by oneplane 4y ago
> let the readers draw their own conclusions That's not how this works. A system-level background process is not going to be 'concluded upon' by random readers on the internet. The only thing you should have written is: &q
561.
by oneplane 4y ago
There are so many things wrong with this article, but the most relevant thing: the EULA contains plenty of consent you give upon agreeing and so do the features with their own data exchange sheets that you have to act on before using the fe
562.
by oneplane 4y ago
It's the base framework where types like NSObject, NSString, NSDictionary etc. are defined. It's right there in the article. It also explains why it exists, what others exist, and what a rewrite will bring.
563.
by oneplane 4y ago
Perhaps the pill we'd need is one to make everyone enjoy exercise at some minimum base level. Plenty of people I've talked to were either not enjoying exercise at all, or did enjoy it while they were doing it, but have a lot of re
564.
by oneplane 4y ago
Mainly because unless it's a business requirement, developers that work with the internals of software (so not just some CRUD layer and protocol that already has been abstracted) prefer to use things that feel good and look nice. XML f
565.
by oneplane 4y ago
From the top of my head: Proxmox and Kubernetes, Rook on top of that for storage. GitLab for manifest storage, ArgoCD for deployment, terraform for node management in proxmox. It's not fully redundant (two separate nodes) but storage i
566.
by oneplane 4y ago
Docker compose is a dead end AFAIK, it's not deprecated or anything, but the community power behind it has essentially moved to other things (Kubernetes, but also wasmer, nomad, skaffold). While Docker Desktop / Podman / Ranc
567.
by oneplane 4y ago
The same way everyone else does: have a compelling offer (towards the people that have the vacancy). Sometimes your offer can only be compelling if you pass some gates like having a certification or having studied a specific subject etc. If
568.
by oneplane 4y ago
I think it's more than just multi-arch, it's also multi-OS (i.e. if we take Windows and BSD into account too we'd get 8 image types required for just 4 operating systems and 2 architectures if kept 'simple'). Packag
569.
by oneplane 4y ago
Yeah, it's a bit of a choice, but a happy user that takes care of the friction is a win for me. From an MDM perspective all we require is that your work machine can run osquery. We host the rules in an internal repo so if someone wants
570.
by oneplane 4y ago
OCI images yes, but that doesn't make them the same. OCI can be used to store many things, and those non-Linux OCI images will not run on Linux. Does that mean that it is Linux at fault for not running arbitrary formats from OCI images

More ›