oneplane

38 ms·

391.
by oneplane 3y ago
To control your data you'd already have to have a notion of "data" and "control", and that's already lacking from most people's daily life. And when you do have those concepts swirling around in your mind,
392.
by oneplane 3y ago
> But a monopoly on core system functions isn't necessary to keep that high bar high. That's an extraordinary statement to make, got any matching evidence? Lots of competitors have been trying for over a decade but nothing has
393.
by oneplane 3y ago
We did have people actually migrate away from JIRA because they didn't need the features, not really because they were required to move to the Cloud instance. But the fact that they now had to move at all made it easier to switch (some
394.
by oneplane 3y ago
We don't have any instances with more than 500 users so perhaps that's the key difference here. We also don't have any PMs or 'admins' that do heavy handed top-down "you must use it this way" configuration
395.
by oneplane 3y ago
Strange... While I have seen many poorly configured PM tools (including more badly configured JIRAs than useful configured JIRAs), I haven't really had any performance issues or UX issues with the ones I work with directly. It's n
396.
by oneplane 3y ago
Sounds like your experience mostly revolves around older self-hosted JIRA versions? The UX on modern JIRA has been fine for years, and the options and forms are easy to use. Granted, you can add useless restrictions and weird field configur
397.
by oneplane 3y ago
Indeed. While I don't "like" the name just yet, it's already pretty recognisable yet not "Terraform"-ish in branding. I suppose that's also a bit of a downside since Terraform is such a brilliant name for
398.
by oneplane 3y ago
This has been reposted many times over the last ~10 years: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=vocore While it's not useless, it's also so underpowered, you might as well stick to the ESP32 family. MIPS 24k is not great, ev
399.
by oneplane 3y ago
It looks like a report on quantity of instances (sites, frameworks, packaged setups) but doesn't go into other metrics like traffic load, users, PnL or other money-metrics. Say the top 100 websites were all to use PHP, that would be a
400.
by oneplane 3y ago
If that is so, factories should maybe not buy software that has a much shorter lifespan than their 20 years. In essence, they are the ones making the mistake, not the OS vendor. Heck, they should probably fork an existing OS and maintain it
401.
by oneplane 3y ago
No, it will not, it is not supported with windows emulated machines. It will work for linux machines to some degree using the additional binfmt handlers which can call out to rosetta. But that's mostly in user space.
402.
by oneplane 3y ago
It will use emulation, which is slow.
403.
by oneplane 3y ago
Software is open-ended in almost all practical scenarios. This means that it is never 'finished' or 'fixed', always prone to new vulnerabilities, performance issues and deprecations. There is no set-and-forget. This then
404.
by oneplane 3y ago
I don't think we overestimate it, but definitely assume more awareness than there actually is. Harm is also real, but much less visible than you'd think and thus mure easier ignored, especially if the negative effects are asynchro
405.
by oneplane 3y ago
So you (and some others) say. But if you have millions of happy and productive users, does it really matter that much?
406.
by oneplane 3y ago
I wonder if some of this also depends on how the secrets are consumed (and created), I'd imagine that if you store things like an API key and secret for a third party API, someone needs to 'enter' that data at some point in t
407.
by oneplane 3y ago
I totally agree that Vault is more than a glorified password manager (because that's what most Clouds have in their implementation of a secrets store), but the thing is, everywhere I go, I don't see people use Vault, I see them us
408.
by oneplane 3y ago
> It's not just "can't have this secret in VCS or viewable via kubectl". That is exactly what it is. You seem to misunderstand (and thus downvote?) the statement I made. I'm not saying "haha vault bad",
409.
by oneplane 3y ago
You generally only run Vault if your secrets don't/won't/can't reside on a public cloud service.
410.
by oneplane 3y ago
You're focusing on the tenant part too much, it's about power. Their knowledge and means are generally not focused to be in power, no matter their tenancy. Equating being able to run a webserver on a privileged port to power, and
411.
by oneplane 3y ago
> You're merely a tenant without any power. By that logic, that's what you are on your phone as well, unless you collected the silicon material, diffused and soldered and programmed it yourself. Even if you assume 'a physi
412.
by oneplane 3y ago
I would guess this is not an emerging driver but rather an artificial driver because that is their primary value proposition.
413.
by oneplane 3y ago
Mostly the default availability and native stability and compatibility with very Mac OS X and macOS release so far. I don't really need the terminal emulator to do much (i.e. I don't need to have it integrate with tmux or screen,
414.
by oneplane 3y ago
I would use Terraform for anything that is provisioning and probably SaltStack for everything else. There are some scenarios where there is no 'one tool for everything', like creating a complex OCI image, a VM image using Packer,
415.
by oneplane 3y ago
Over the years I've had many of those but I often ended up preferring some for some tasks but overall using most of them. Examples (including dead products and random tools you might not always put in the same league): Desktop Envi
416.
by oneplane 3y ago
Because the government can put you in jail and the marketing agency can't. (I think I heard this simplified response on the Risky Business podcast) Realistically, scraping people for their data like this should just not be allowed at a
417.
by oneplane 3y ago
I think the article hits the nail on the head. DNS itself isn't hard, but learning real-world DNS is, due to the (as described) hidden nature of many parts between intending to do a lookup and getting the expected result. Some of this
418.
by oneplane 3y ago
Yes they are. But it's not about that either. You are conflating end-user products with two companies developing to the same central point from opposing start positions. That is what this is about.
419.
by oneplane 3y ago
This isn't about mainstream consumers either. This is about a technological development where the balance between performance and energy consumption is attacked from both ends, where one vendor has the performance and the other vendor
420.
by oneplane 3y ago
This is not a strange hardening technique at all. You'd obviously weigh the friction vs. added security, but at Google scale you'd probably be engineering on Google sources using Google tools on Google systems anyway, it's no

More ›