oneplane

32 ms·

331.
by oneplane 3y ago
Is it? CompuTrace and Intel AT would like to have a word with you. As do Dell, Samsung, Sony and Lenovo. Sure, their entry level consumer goods tend to have that mostly implemented in software, but even base tier business products have this
332.
by oneplane 3y ago
I am not saying you are the only person who used Boot Camp. And I am also not saying this can only apply to x86_64. And if you use your own definition of 'open', just buy some random Dell or Lenovo laptop and live a happy life. Ap
333.
by oneplane 3y ago
This has happened with various anti-theft systems for a really long time, most of those cases not having a happy ending (some sort of class-action payout of a few pennies at best). I wouldn't be surprised that there is no real 'ha
334.
by oneplane 3y ago
> Buy a laptop whose hardware is actually open. Nice idea in theory, not really applicable in the real world. Not on the technical side because it doesn't exist (you have no access go the Intel Boot ROM on the CPU, and not to modern
335.
by oneplane 3y ago
PEX everything!
336.
by oneplane 3y ago
Article seems a bit hollow, it first assigns all sorts of values that do not appear to be consistent with the (sparse) references, and then it points out how the problem isn't with the drug policy concepts but with the drugs themselves
337.
by oneplane 3y ago
While I don't mix text and voice control that often myself, it appears to be fully supported: https://faq.whatsapp.com/1803878309981730/?locale=sv_SE&cms_... as for what actions an app supports, that appears t
338.
by oneplane 3y ago
As far as I could find, the text suggests that only applies to market giants (i.e. Meta with WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger). iMessage is not even breaking the top 5 in the EU. It's not even in the top 5 world wide, and even in the US
339.
by oneplane 3y ago
Don't WhatsApp and Signal already do exactly that?
340.
by oneplane 3y ago
You're wrong. Radio and TV from your example get paid anyway and you count as a watcher in the statistics so it doesn't matter if you're there for the broadcast or not, transaction complete either way. When you are an on-dema
341.
by oneplane 3y ago
And that's where that 'if' is important: iMessage isn't very relevant outside of the US. Worldwide it doesn't even reach the top 5. Inside the US, even Facebook Messenger is apparently used more than iMessage.
342.
by oneplane 3y ago
iMessage is Apple's service, and they can do with it whatever they want. No other arguments are really relevant. As for whatever reasons Apple comes up with: that is probably also not going to be relevant as a multinational that is beh
343.
by oneplane 3y ago
The projects can be appreciated while also acknowledging that advertisements are part of the value exchange. There's nothing wrong with knowing that if your options are to either watch ads or pay for a service, and you privateer the se
344.
by oneplane 3y ago
Of course they do, if there's a way to get data without it being obviously illegal, it probably going to get collected. And I wouldn't be surprised if plenty of constructions like it either have a gag order or national security le
345.
by oneplane 3y ago
Unless your company has one product ("orderliness"), that seems not all that relevant. It's also highly unlikely that some sort of 'boss at the top' knows everything and therefore is the only one with the capability
346.
by oneplane 3y ago
Sounds like you are into some 90's top-down management mentality right there. Good luck with that. (in my experience, that no longer works well, and is a poor solution applied in highly regulated markets and mainframe land) That makes
347.
by oneplane 3y ago
That's what we do and it's great. It doesn't even apply to just Kubernetes, you should be able to swap out most components of your infrastructure without manual work, that's why we even invented all this modern software,
348.
by oneplane 3y ago
So in other words: no it doesn't. The CNCF does its thing, and if you want something else, you can give money to AWS or Azure or GCP and have your cake and eat it too. I'd rather not see the resources in the Kubernetes project bei
349.
by oneplane 3y ago
Or, they could use something that is not Kubernetes. If you are working with a system that is super static, Podman comes to mind.
350.
by oneplane 3y ago
No it doesn't. If you can't keep up you have two options: 1. Pay someone else to do it for you (effectively an LTS) 2. Don't use it Software is imperfect, processes are imperfect. An LTS doesn't fix that, it just pushes
351.
by oneplane 3y ago
As far as I could tell, the handler wasn't inside the NOC, but was able to contact them directly. I suppose 1st and 2nd level don't actually have to be inside the NOC to be of use. Wouldn't be surprised it they do some sort o
352.
by oneplane 3y ago
When I used to call them I just asked for the NOC and they connected me to the NOC first line handler. Might be different now (~3 years difference).
353.
by oneplane 3y ago
Hanlon's razor suggests either human error (someone putting in the wrong DNS entry on their end) or someone abusing a cloudflare service. All the other suggestions of malice are rather inefficient, especially considering the net value
354.
by oneplane 3y ago
That looks like it's SwitchBoard, not iOS. Users do not have access to the internal Apple test software. As for Rhapsody, that looked decent, it had a similar vibe to A/UX where it looks like Mac OS Classic but runs Unix. Perhaps
355.
by oneplane 3y ago
It's already in an unrecoverable death spiral, not from a money sense but from a brand and management sense. Without functional moderation and a trustworthy brand there is nothing to keep it afloat.
356.
by oneplane 3y ago
> you'd expect I don't. I expect that when I pay for a streaming service, as soon as the money is in their account all bets are off and no insight is given. So such a generalisation of what people expect doesn't hold up f
357.
by oneplane 3y ago
Without cryptographic pairing (and a hard requirement at that) and secure channels that aren't optional, none of the setups can really be secure. SDCP tried to do this, but with so much being optional and scoped smaller than the actual
358.
by oneplane 3y ago
Yes and no. So on one hand you'd have to trust the vendor to allow you to control the connectivity (this is likely going to be the same model as iOS and watchOS devices -- unless you add a subscription it doesn't connect). On the
359.
by oneplane 3y ago
Or they could just not brand it "Open" if it's not open.
360.
by oneplane 3y ago
> did I say Not with so many words, but that is what your security model implies. You also haven't reported your other means with which you can ensure platform integrity so I think you don't actually know enough about this topi

More ›