oneplane

33 ms·

301.
by oneplane 3y ago
I would argue that it would be nice that everything that has a CPU and RAM is a general purpose computing device, but just because it is nice doesn't mean that it is reality or an effective use of products. If we arbitrarily classify t
302.
by oneplane 3y ago
The difference is that Microsoft was targeting general purpose computing with policy-based restrictions, and Apple is selling mobile phones that are not general purpose computing devices and later on a service ecosystem to go with it. We co
303.
by oneplane 3y ago
Already a thing (mostly remote controlled drone ships). But you'll always need mitigating controls for unexpected or low frequency events, and it's not always feasible to fly in a crew at which point the crew needs to be on board.
304.
by oneplane 3y ago
So it's mostly "a virtual machine managed as a Dockerfile", which you can then use to run a virtual machine that runs Windows but it could run any OS.
305.
by oneplane 3y ago
> You don't have to allow all users everything, but you should allow those who want, to do as they please. Perhaps. Perhaps that should also mean there are consequences to their actions and they get disconnected from shared systems.
306.
by oneplane 3y ago
> The correct response, if (as in this case) they were warned, is to say “someone did warn you, pay more attention next time”, then walk away[1]. In reality, this does far more harm than good. In almost all cases this goes wrong because
307.
by oneplane 3y ago
Their "throw as many SKUs at the market and see what sticks" model is very typical. That is not uniquely Microsoft and is very common in broad supply enterprises. The only thing that is unique about microsoft is being in the right
308.
by oneplane 3y ago
A better way to describe their differences is that Apple started as an end-user company (and became a services company while at it) where hardware was a means to an end. The products they sell are based around an experience rather than just
309.
by oneplane 3y ago
We need at least three parties with different browser engines with all of them at least having double digits percentage user share to prevent another IE5/IE6 mess. It doesn't even have to be on the same platform, one platform with
310.
by oneplane 3y ago
Technically it's true that if you were to equate influence to the ability to protect, that when you lose that influence you also lose the ability to protect. So far, it's all been speculation, even drawing parallels with Android o
311.
by oneplane 3y ago
Think of it this way: knives are available on the open market, that doesn't mean NSA can just go around stabbing people. The concept of a warrant is to have an authorization to do something that an entity would normally not be allowed
312.
by oneplane 3y ago
Neat! I completely forgot about that, and it's nice to re-discover the gripping hand.
313.
by oneplane 3y ago
"It depends". On one hand, if I were to have the goal to make a bunch of money, and software just happens to be the means to an end, making a gated software portal where I control everything would suit me very well. You get nothin
314.
by oneplane 3y ago
tl;dr: the world is messy, automations and remote control by vendors has shown to be the only working method vs. individual responsibility/organisational responsibility, and the law isn't against that (at least not in the EU so fa
315.
by oneplane 3y ago
That has already been done, but it's not really the point of this; the point is to put M1 chips (or M2, M3 etc) in a blade-like enclosure for non-standard workloads (like GitHub runners). The fact that it also has a legit serial number
316.
by oneplane 3y ago
Gladys can drive around for hours at will, while Bill has no choice. Bill is still a sucker.
317.
by oneplane 3y ago
I think they would be referred to as 'suckers' because they are spending time for their employer for which they are not compensated in that scenario (two options, both pay the same, but one requires you to sacrifice significant po
318.
by oneplane 3y ago
I think direct manipulation never went away, but the abstractions that were provided for general use were too useful to pass up for most workloads. Some kinds of storage like cloud-scale object storage use custom HDD firmwares and custom on
319.
by oneplane 3y ago
That's how the whole system is setup. The information you get across schools is practically the same (the all operate within the same laws, business practises etc) but the difference is that those more expensive schools are 'filte
320.
by oneplane 3y ago
GNS3 can do that
321.
by oneplane 3y ago
In the context of just Boeing, that makes sense. In the broader 'news' context, it's bad, because there are a crapton of things that really aren't as significant as they are made out to be to the layman. It's not a
322.
by oneplane 3y ago
But it needs to be more enterprise-y, X.400 with maybe X.25 should do nicely.
323.
by oneplane 3y ago
It applies to you in the sense that your services are covered by the CRA. Your projects themselves probably don't unless you have an open-core model where you have a commercialised 'supported' version, in which case you'
324.
by oneplane 3y ago
By that logic, nobody should own anything, or owners should not be allowed to set the rules about the things they own and on what terms they can share or transfer that ownership?
325.
by oneplane 3y ago
At a startup phase, I'm not sure there is anything that is strictly speaking a "CTO" task, except the paperwork. And once you get big enough for it to matter, the same rule applies as for a CEO: the CxO you need for your firs
326.
by oneplane 3y ago
PAM does not preclude having everything secure instead of some sort of 'hardened' bastion and 'soft' destination. Everything should be 'hardened'. This also means everything has to do proper authentication and
327.
by oneplane 3y ago
But why? Why should anyone providing a service be forced to also allow others to represent that service? Shouldn't it be up to the service owner to figure out what they want to do with it? The only reasoning behind the whole iMessage t
328.
by oneplane 3y ago
Except that those networks are listed to pad the functionality of the app, not because they actually work the way they should. FB for example: Stories/Reels/Posts Sharing: Not supported. End-to-end encrypted chats: Not suppo
329.
by oneplane 3y ago
Depending on where you live, almost nobody is on iMessage to begin with. Almost all of the noise around iMessage and beeper is US-centric yet even in the US most people are using FB Messenger and not iMessage. Yet we don't see Beeper s
330.
by oneplane 3y ago
That's a pretty bleak and somewhat unrealistic outlook. And just because they are 'another rootkit' or 'discontinued' (which I already mentioned) doesn't mean they aren't existing examples. As for your sta

More ›