oneoneonetwo

4 ms·

1.
by oneoneonetwo 4y ago
the horizontal aspect of software has samey caricatures that get boring as well. Most of it is web development. If you switch verticals but stay in the same horizontal zone of back end web development you're mostly doing the same stuff
2.
by oneoneonetwo 4y ago
Wow. Read the article guys. He says eye strain is caused by blue light. That's why he uses light mode. That makes no sense. Blue light is ORTHOGONAL to the question of whether Dark Mode or Light Mode is better for your eyes. Does light
3.
by oneoneonetwo 4y ago
In science nothing is provable. Things can be falsified but if a hypothesis is true it can actually never be proven. This is because at any point in time and additional observation can be added to your sample that definitively disproves you
4.
by oneoneonetwo 4y ago
>which admittedly, many people still seem to want to do. This occurs because most science is not the "the frontiers of modern physics". But even then, falsification in the frontiers of modern physics is still a useful tool.
5.
by oneoneonetwo 4y ago
I also want to mention that, you directly stated in your first sentence in your first post that humanizing was wrong. This in itself is a claim made without evidence. Which is my point. The claim as it stands cannot be made either way. We s
6.
by oneoneonetwo 4y ago
>while continuously insulting the GP. Read the conversation. You are accusing me of something vile which the GP started. GP Literally said that science was something elementary school level shit implying that I was so damn stupid I was u
7.
by oneoneonetwo 4y ago
It's an invalid falsification. The input to chatGPT is a textual interface, the output is letters on a screen. That is the exact same interface as if I were chatting with a human over a chat app. Your getting into the technicalities of
8.
by oneoneonetwo 4y ago
I don't know if you played with chatGPT but it's much more than a just right sequence of inputs and outputs. I have already incorporated into my daily use (as a programmer). It has huge flaws but the output is anecdotally amazing
9.
by oneoneonetwo 4y ago
> In science, if you don't know, you don't make the claim, that is basic positivism and the scientific method. Yes you're correct. So you can't make the claim that it's NOT cognition. That is my point. You also c