onecooldev24

6 ms·

1.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Do you understand the meaning of those words "censorship or restraint""
2.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Apple is not a private entity, its publicly traded company that has a monopoly.
3.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
We are living in a state of monopoly and EU laws agree with that. How can you then throw away freedom of speech! Just cause the goons on this forum are pissed, doesn't mean that guy should be banned. 48% of population voted for trump!
4.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Floating ideas is not "Fire in a crowded theatre"!
5.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
The only thing rubbish here is blatant disregard for freedom of speech (Didn't really expect anything different from the fools here). There are platforms that are monopoly and they control free speech at this point.
6.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
If I may ask, which weight lifting exercise caused the problem?
7.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
lite wallets are NOT 'trustful' wallets.
8.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
If you don't understand the broad idea of my statement, then sorry to say this my friend, you are a fool.
9.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Do companies write checks to plumbers of $100,000. No they don't, cause they don't deserve (intelligence required for the work they do) and the supply is abundant. Why can't western developers accept basic economics and move
10.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Well then the buyer and seller would race to gain 51% of mining power (as its free) which will make it more expensive because of the constant biding war.
11.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Top miners can short twice as many BTC futures to create one last profitable destruction.
12.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
if multiple accounts send multiple small payments (controlled by the same guy), then the exchange wont wait as long for the confirmations.
13.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
can you explain this in better words: "then it would always make sense to rent 51% of the capacity at market rates, earn the transaction fees, and also perform a double-spending attack."
14.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
you can split the payment to multiple small amounts.
15.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
All I am saying is that $400 in 2013 is not worth $430 today, Its wort a LOT MORE! Stop arguing like a idiot.
16.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
doesnt this look like the chart of CPI https://finance.yahoo.com/chart/DBC https://www.bls.gov/charts/consumer-price-index/consumer-pri...
17.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Thats exactly how asset managers construct a portfolio thats suppose to track inflation.
18.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
"Average price data for select utility, automotive fuel, and food items are also available." All of these are commodities. And every single product derived is based on commodity. Most commodities can be traded on commodity markets
19.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Govt inflation numbers represent a portfolio consisting of all commodities in equal quantity. But if you hold a portfolio of iPhones, Toyotas, and etc (assuming they are non depreciating assets) that number would double very easily.
20.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
This can easily be done on CME futures market, we don't need dharma for this. Futures can be used in multiple ways to swap inherent volatility with a fixed stream of return.
21.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Just for entertainment.
22.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Why weren't these points raised for gold & diamond mining through out human civilization. Africans have been killed ruthlessly for diamonds and our so called "smart users" of HN can't seem to see eye to eye on these
23.
A JavaScript API for drawing unconventional text effects on the web(blotter.js.org)
1 points by onecooldev24 8y ago|0 comments
24.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
So according to you gold should be valued at zero?
25.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Have you been sleeping your entire life. Why can't you bring the same points up for gold. Civilizations have been destroyed for gold, let alone electricity.
26.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
No fiat currency will go to zero.
27.
by onecooldev24 8y ago
Eventually Bitcoin or the fiat currency goes to zero. I think Indian politicians made the wrong choice.
28.
by onecooldev24 9y ago
Well then I would love if you got a 3 year sentence for jaywalking.
29.
by onecooldev24 9y ago
What about the fact, that he paid from his own shareholding of the company, and the company investors didn't end up paying for it. The bigger point every one is missing is, he got a 800% increase from the average sentence. That IS NOT
30.
by onecooldev24 9y ago
"Nothing unethical was done it him, he was convicted and sentenced accordingly" Dumbfounded by your words, a 800% increase from the average sentence is, I think completely ok in a just system.

More ›