onebaddog

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   SCons 4.8.0 Released(scons.org)

   2 points by onebaddog 2y ago|0 comments
2. 2.▲
   SCons 4.3.0 Released(scons.org)

   4 points by onebaddog 5y ago|0 comments
3. 3.▲
   SCons 4.2.0 released with experimental Ninja Support(scons.org)

   2 points by onebaddog 5y ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   SCons Releases 4.1.0(scons.org)

   1 points by onebaddog 6y ago|0 comments
5. 5.▲
   by onebaddog 6y ago

   Not even SCons people. (I'm the project maintainer)
6. 6.▲
   by onebaddog 6y ago

   Actually not true. Many large projects continue to use SCons and new projects as well. I don't think in 2018 we had our heads in the sand about SCons' performance. As project maintainer I've (along with other community member
7. 7.▲
   by onebaddog 6y ago

   As the maintainer of SCons I can assure you that we are aware of SCons's performance issue. The page in question is actually quite old at this point. Since the content was written Ninja, Cmake, Bazel, and other build systems have launc
8. 8.▲
   by onebaddog 7y ago

   I'm the current SCons project Co-Manager. Nice to see spirited conversation. A couple data points on performance. A current snapshot of MongoDB's repo will do a null incremental build in 53 seconds on my i7-2600 with non-ssd driv