Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
omh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
91.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
This seems like it would be much easier as a feature on your router/access point. Their description suggests that it's just using a blacklist of MAC addresses so it would be pretty easy to add to something like OpenWRT or a captiv
92.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
I've been running a similar setup for a few months, feeding data to http://www.flightradar24.com/ . If you upload data to them like this then you get premium access to their site and app which is nice. In fact I found t
93.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
Unfortunately you need a Windows license per VM. I guess that at many places you'd just buy datacenter edition, but that's a bit too much for small businesses.
94.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
That's the "worst" RC4 attack I'm aware of. But I'm not sure that it's quite at the level of a practical attack - certainly not as bad as POODLE.
95.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
It seems that this is an attack on the CBC-mode ciphers but doesn't change anything about the RC4 ciphers. RC4 is mentioned in passing as having weaknesses, but is it actually broken? If we can't disable SSL3 completely would usin
96.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
I'm curious if this "vulnerability" also exists in XP I was curious as well. Elsewhere the article says it's not vulnerable: ...a zero-day vulnerability impacting all supported versions of Microsoft Windows (XP is not
97.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
Says my account was hacked, but then gives me the incorrect two letters for the start of my password Out of interest - are those two letters the start of a password from any other site? Presumably the leak came from a third party site so
98.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
This seems like such a neat, simple idea. Perfect for integration with IFTTT or similar. I'm a little surprised that nothing like this exists already. I can see how you could easily build one yourself. But that doesn't give you th
99.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
I think it also has a built in GSM module so that you don't need to pair it to WiFi. If it's completely standalone then that's particularly nice for the shop/hotel use case. And makes it easier for average home users. Bu
100.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
They're using the right dates. So today's tweets are for August 1942.
101.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
From that article: Unfortunately, the SMTPS port is only used for the submission of authenticated mail by mail clients. Opportunistic encryption between SMTP servers, which is extremely important for preventing passive eavesdropping of ema
102.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
From a comment on that blog: That would have been even more work, because there was at the time no infrastructure in Setup for having 32-bit-only components. (And then automatically uninstalling it when WOW64 was disabled.) And besides, all
103.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
My understanding was that, roughly, if you pay a regular payment as rent for a property then you have an AST - whether the contract says so or not. This is mainly in the context of house/flat rentals though; I realise that perhaps per-
104.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
In the UK you almost certainly have an Assured Shorthold Tenancy (even if the agent says you don't). This gives you a lot of strong rights which you can use if you know how. In practice the agent or landlord has a lot of leverage but
105.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
I've seen posters up in the local A&E that say something like "If you're a foreigner please be aware that we'll send you an invoice". And there's certainly been statements recently from politicians talking
106.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
Is there a better workaround that doesn't hinder IPv6? I agree that it would be better not to harm IPv6 growth. But if the alternative is to break the IPv4 internet then the choice seems obvious.
107.
▲
Why the head of Mt. Gox Bitcoin exchange should be in jail
(arstechnica.com)
5 points
by
omh
12y ago
|
0 comments
108.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
It's certainly true that the UK has a sort of dead-man's-switch (depending on exactly what the letter of last resort says). But I presume that there is also a more active communication method as well. If the Prime Minister wante
109.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
It isn't just going to come from cloud/distributed systems. You can scale up to a huge extent just with average x86 servers now and these are competing with what used to be done on a mainframe. So even many companies who don'
110.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
I doubt that little message is going to stop anyone from printing On at least one occasion I've printed an email and ended up using an extra page because of the extended "Please think twice" section.
111.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
If you're in the UK then you should contact your MP about this to let them know what you think. And you need to do it now - the vote is on Monday. Perhaps if they realise what people think about this they might reconsider. Contacting y
112.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
Yes, this is separate from whatever GCHQ are doing. GCHQ are (I assume) intercepting data out in the wild wherever they can then storing and analysing that themselves. This is apparently covered under other laws, but certainly isn't af
113.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
It may be slightly more clever than that. David Allen Green suggests[1] that this moves the legislation so that it is directly implemented by UK law rather than as a result of an EU law. This means that the current court ruling wouldn'
114.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
It calls it the Glass Explorer Edition but the price is "only" £1,000
115.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
Can you clarify what you mean by "browsing data"? I understand why some data could be useful for debugging, but it's the DPI-style data that I'm most concerned about. I'd assumed that it would be too expensive for I
116.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
The article says: unless it can be proven that the recipient consented to them or was a customer – with John Lewis unable to satisfy either requirement So it sounds like in this case he didn't actually purchase anything. I've ne
117.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
Obviously it will depend on your workload. Although I rarely boot my PC I am running a number of virtual machines and the SSD helps when booting those.
118.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
SSL 2.0 is a disaster How bad is this? I have internet-facing production web servers running software which (unfortunately) does not support TLS even in the most recent versions. Are there practical attacks I should be worried about?
119.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
I've just checked, and I have this for one of my .com namecheap domains but not the other. I suspect that this is a side effect of Namecheap's "WhoisGuard" feature. This hides your Whois details, and I think there was a
120.
▲
by
omh
12y ago
So they couldn't call it "SSL 3" because it couldn't be seen to be the Netscape proposal - fair enough. But it's a shame they didn't take the simpler route and just call it "SSL 4".
More ›