Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
olliej
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
61 ms
·
781.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Have you worked in customer service? The kind of BS that these "auditors" do that results in them being arrested doesn't come close to the BS I personally experienced on a daily basis working in retail, and somehow I was able
782.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
In any real sense the police "unions" are unique in that they're the only union that actively opposed and attacks other unions. Every union other than the police unions is attacked because they "hurt the economy" (t
783.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
What does "android style" mean here? Android has RCS which is just as insecure as SMS (encrypted chats aren't RCS, they're binary blobs using RCS as a transport mechanism - saying they're RCS is like saying iMessage
784.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Yeah it was such a bizarre argument that highlights just how unconstitutional this is: "if we need a warrant to do this, we wouldn't be able to do it because we'd fail the probable cause part". That's not a good arg
785.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
> To provide some clarity on this, it likely isn't targeting specifically non-Chrome browsers It's not targeting non-chrome browsers, it's just a before penalty that only applies to ... non-chrome browsers? > Secondaril
786.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
awww now I want to see, but also probably don't :D
787.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
transport encryption is literally the bare minimum for anything on the network these days (to the extent that iOS endeavors straight up blocks all the standard unencrypted protocol ports by default). But also transport encryption is not rel
788.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Are you saying that retaliation for report a person in a hiring position making racist jokes is reasonable? Because that's what it sounds like you're saying. Racism in employment is explicitly illegal, and any Sri Lankan could now
789.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
No, the complaint is that media matters lied and slandered X by making up a story. MM isn't suing anyone, X is. Given that MM documented what they did, and plenty of others have confirmed that behavior, it seems hard to see how MM lied
790.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
This could easily also just be “I deeply regret my actions being the losing side”
791.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I made one of these in the 80s using the dick smith fun way to electronics kit, that are alas now defunct.
792.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Well yes, RCS is not encrypted
793.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
No, NDAs are the tool to stop your employees leaking information. Non competes are the tools you use to avoid paying market price for your employee.
794.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I have no problem with non-competes as long as the company is willing to buy out the non-compete period, e.g. the maximum of current total compensation or competing offer comp, plus say a 100% premium to cover opportunity cost. You might sa
795.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Yeah, so they didn't reverse engineer anything, they literally take your password and then have you approve them registering a Mac mini they control as a trusted device in iCloud. At that point they have access to your entire iCloud ac
796.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Ok, it's still absurd to me that RCS or Google Messages weren't E2EE from day 1 given even iMessage was doing E2EE group chats almost 5 years before the RCS "universal" profile was released so its not like they didn'
797.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
He's been known to be a piece of shit for years - recall that he did not found Tesla, he just out lawyered the actual founders and kicked them out of the company. He was already known to have abandoned his kids. All of his companies ha
798.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
My interpretation of this isn’t that they don’t have 230 protection, but that they failed to successfully argue that in their motion to dismiss. E.g it seems like they might still be allowed to argue 230 based immunity in a full trial?
799.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Wait so google doesn’t support e2ee for more than two devices in a chat?
800.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
“Requiring the constitutionally mandated probable cause to spy on people would ban spying on them when we don’t have probable cause” is certainly a take
801.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
The problem is when what you call an ideology is actually just “acceptance of people who are different”. No one is out there telling kids that they can’t be a binary gender, no one is saying you have to be a different gender from what you w
802.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I assume the downvotes are because that phrasing is dog whistling for “I am homo/transphobic”. Consider other variations along the same lines: “gender equality ideology” or “race equality ideology”. The inference is “I am opposed to th
803.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
The price discovery of it in the browser, literally the thing that was accidentally leaked, that this article is about. What part of this article talking about payments to be the default search engine would imply search ads or popularity as
804.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Which is why this is coming up in an antitrust trial. People do talk about how “Google is legitimately better than the competition”[1] while ignoring the competition that never happens because there’s no path to profitability due to googl’s
805.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
They also closed a bunch of the bay bridge, and a bunch of local transit lines, so it's super obnoxious for people.
806.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
This is what I was unclear on - I couldn't tell if this was one-hop (and so tremendously invasive "privacy"), or two hops through an independent 3rd party (and so actually a privacy feature).
807.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
In that case the complaints other comments people are making are simply wrong. There isn't a privacy concern here, I think google has just burned so much trust that the _assumption_ is now that the goal is tracking.
808.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
From other comments it _sounds_ like Google's system is done as a single proxy, which is bizarre to me because it means google can see every site that is loaded which even for google seems on the nose. Apple's service is explicitl
809.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
No it absolutely does not. I think you're confusing CT with OCSP, which is the browser checking to see if a certificate has been revoked, which died a death not just because it was incredibly slow and unreliable (CA's OCSP server
810.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Remember this kind of BS when governments and police talk about how there secret access won't be exploited by criminals.
More ›