Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
oliculipolicula
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
27d ago
Finally, 2 of the more serious thinkers (of the past, at least) left on HN get together to discuss next nearest neighbors to discussions I'm interested in .. Nearest neighbour discussions would be like 1) do individuals have a rig
32.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
27d ago
It does, but since the derivative of energy wrt length gives force and the derivative of momentum wrt time also gives force, maybe the point is that both guys should have settled their differences and discovered relativity ?
33.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
27d ago
> And a rare few can hold off the math for a very long time. A slightly more interesting, maybe even instructive ad hominem: Some influential investors tell everyone, including themselves, they are good at holding off the magic when the
34.
▲
Tyler Cowen grills Acemoglu on liberalism, automation, edu elitism
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
oliculipolicula
27d ago
|
0 comments
35.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
27d ago
What you should be doing next is to pivot your programming skills plus interest in identifying "categorical errors" to help me look for elephants in the room housing all the different "categorical imperatives" :) as a ho
36.
▲
Boulding on the human use of human beings
(philofecon.substack.com)
3 points
by
oliculipolicula
28d ago
|
0 comments
37.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
29d ago
https://philofecon.substack.com/p/notes-towards-a-definition... https://publish.uwo.ca/~jbell/univ.pdf Otoh I think Grothendieck's point would be stronger today if his tribe of scientists are
38.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
29d ago
Almost, but not quite. Consider https://www.ft.com/content/6f3ada65-c56c-499c-8eb6-008fac589... I hate to say it, but the reality (AI, today) might be closest to PG's "intuition",to wit, it doesn't
39.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
Well then what are you waiting for :) You've got the tool, you've got the will
40.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
Tbh I'd rather see paganist cells take on those mantles, not universities. For one, they are unlikely to be co-opted by rationalist Empires run by navel-gazing non-enbies waving a sceptre of _secret-non-secrets_ (perhaps better unpacke
41.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
In TFA itself! The multiplication they call an "alternating [skew-symmetric?] invariant form": Q0 in symbols I think? Basically a polynomial function in the components of the "superoctonions" that go into the product.tha
42.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
for maybe undergrads, complex structure in S^6 would mean an associative version of octonions (which are non associative "almost complex" versions of their cousins native to S^3, which you may know as (unit) "quaternions"
43.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
[It goes without saying that I'm neither an expert at people, nor an MBA. But let me _try_ to unpack TFA like _I_ am 10 or 15. Please bear with me.] In general there's a sort of arms race between Technical Direction Setters (TDS)
44.
▲
Tech leads should have the largest AI exhaust
(schipper.ai)
2 points
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
|
2 comments
45.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
[It goes without saying that I'm neither an expert at people, nor an MBA. But let me _try_ to unpack you for PP like _I_ am 10 or 15. Looks like I should be interested in what both of you would say in response, so it might be worthwhi
46.
▲
Hamilton's Theory of Turns Revisited
(arxiv.org)
1 points
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
|
0 comments
47.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
Maybe related Hamilton's theory of turns revisited https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.4787
48.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
[Disclaimer: no AI whatsoever was used in any part of the following; sorry if you can't verify that, though] I've come to think that one unequivocal upside of "affordable ASI" would be to bring about a world of discourse
49.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
Sorry for not trying to be inventive but merely maybe contrarian I've come to think that one unequivocal upside of "affordable ASI" would be to bring about a world of discourse where discursers would hesitate to think of (not
50.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
Thank you. It should be noted that this piece hasn't been downweighted off the frontpage I suspect that dang is trying to extract some previously unobtainable upside from the contrarian dynamic . Mad respect. https://hn.algo
51.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
You would probably experience a much larger benefit after Anthropic's product gets stolen and released on GitHub for free. This reminds me of the myth of Prometheus. I think most Greek thinkers would agree that Prometheus was the hero
52.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
Careful here. This comes close to precisely what dang thinks is a bannable offense https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175827 Fwiw whenever you come close to commiting a "HN capital offence" I am biased ag
53.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
https://condensedconcepts.blogspot.com/2012/05/characteristi...
54.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
Even post-WW2. I'm sympathetic to PP's POV thus I'd really like to extract fallacies from it. Your q seems to suggest that setups like Bell Labs (but not to forget ARPA) were probably on the Pareto front of how to organize sc
55.
▲
Energy, surplus, economic process (December 2026)
(sciencedirect.com)
1 points
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
|
0 comments
56.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
That was fun but this is gun? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-026-03375-4 The two teams could "synergize" their tacit knowledge, overcome "involution"? Without open peer review like in the ol
57.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
Check out the cognates for arrow, car (chariot) and horse ( mare ) Old school tech exchange, basically https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=24918
58.
▲
Affordable AI+human insight helped us close 40yr sporadic group Galois problem
(shaowuzhang.com)
3 points
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
|
0 comments
59.
▲
by
oliculipolicula
1mo ago
PP is (probably) a market maximalist. Many rationalists end up there. Strangely, there are market maximalists who try to answer all your questions.. E.g. Buterin, Weyl, Friedman. How we started talking in the first place, remember? It was r
60.
▲
OpenAI found us generators for maximal Monster subgroup holdout 59:29
(arxiv.org)
3 points
by
oliculipolicula
2mo ago
|
0 comments
More ›