ok123456

19 ms·

421.
by ok123456 2y ago
I'm protesting Drew for his RMS smear campaign.
422.
by ok123456 2y ago
So we should "just trust" the same people who said that Saddam had WMDs?
423.
by ok123456 2y ago
In this case, it is this simple. AIPAC wanted this. They threaten congressmen who buck them with being primaried. They reward compliance with money. This is not behavior we see routinely from other special interests.
424.
by ok123456 2y ago
There are many Jews who disagree with what AIPAC does in the country and what Israel does. Would we permit a lobby for China to do the same thing?
425.
by ok123456 2y ago
If your router chose your IGMP groups for you.
426.
by ok123456 2y ago
AIPAC made sure it had bipartisan support.
427.
by ok123456 2y ago
Tibet was a feudal society. The only people who were "crushed" were the people landowners and the elite monks. Both sides of the strait want the status quo in Taiwan for various reasons. Detent would be the correct approach instea
428.
by ok123456 2y ago
So you don't have any? ok.
429.
by ok123456 2y ago
Maybe my interests and those of the general American public are more in line with the "CCP" than Israel regarding international affairs.
430.
by ok123456 2y ago
Civil rights aren't a zero-sum game. America must lead by example by not silencing 170 million people because of some "intelligence" that's likely less reputable than Saddam having WMDs or the Marty Rimm report.
431.
by ok123456 2y ago
AIPAC (foreign lobby) money. They also profited heavily from picking favorites. Senator Cotton mysteriously increased his net wealth by 2 million in the past year.
432.
by ok123456 2y ago
As demonstrated by this ban, we're objectively worse now. The true threat to our democracy is a foreign power. It's just not China.
433.
by ok123456 2y ago
No it's not.
434.
by ok123456 2y ago
Please share a source that's not a CIA funded NGO or think tank.
435.
by ok123456 2y ago
Then don't use it.
436.
by ok123456 2y ago
I'm an American too, and I trust an app that has "china" somewhere in it's org chart more than Zuckerberg or any meta product.
437.
by ok123456 2y ago
They do have freedom of speech—Citizen's United. The more significant issue is that this is a bill of attainder. The fact that this was prima facia rejected by the courts is an indication that the NatSec state has corroded every branch
438.
by ok123456 2y ago
This is the NatSec state hope casting.
439.
by ok123456 2y ago
Sorry, it is a free speech issue. TikTok is a gestalt product of the content on there. Maybe Washington should figure out a way to make fewer "Foreign adversaries" so it doesn't have to subvert the fundamental rights of its c
440.
by ok123456 2y ago
Why is that insane? We should lead by example if we value free speech.
441.
by ok123456 2y ago
All the other content recommendation systems force you into a ghetto and are highly auto-regressive. They only show you content like they already showed you, so you will never be exposed to new things. This hampers discovery, and you end up
442.
by ok123456 2y ago
Why would I sell my business just to appease some gangsters on capitol hill?
443.
by ok123456 2y ago
Everyone thinks their consumption is more virtuous than everyone else. HN provides the same basic neophilia.
444.
by ok123456 2y ago
A boycott is a form of protest.
445.
by ok123456 2y ago
30+ states have anti-BDS statutes that make it a crime to criticize Israel.
446.
by ok123456 2y ago
They make up lies that they tell them in the SCIF. It's just theater.
447.
by ok123456 2y ago
I'm trying not to derail the conversation by saying the state of Israel, and its lobbying apparatus.
448.
by ok123456 2y ago
So are American ones, apparently.
449.
by ok123456 2y ago
Most apps coerce their users into sharing location information. That's why they released apps and did not just use progressive web apps in the first place. But, this is done under the guise of commercial interests, usually advertising,
450.
by ok123456 2y ago
https://www.tiktok.com/@claimslife1

More ›