ohhman11

5 ms·

31.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
>the effects of social media on kids is too strong, and too negative to deny at this point. Bold claim that really needs some evidence. Is there research which shows that kids who grow up with social media are less likely to succeed as a
32.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
That's just inexcusably bad. They claimed to be working on the issue 7 months ago, but that was obviously a straight up lie.
33.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
>Where are search warrants issued via public proceedings? You could make the same point about any jurisdiction. It's different though, typically you can fight those warrants after the fact, with EIOs you have to do the fighting in a
34.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
It allows NYT to add a bunch of words for the sole purpose of making Trump sound more convincing.
35.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
What espionage equipment could China put in Cuba that they could not put inside the US?
36.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
>To have a productive discussion on HN, I'd like to ask a question I've always wondered about the USA: How come, given how the media represents things, there haven't been any new media companies, no new news shows, no new
37.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
They did not write the more accurate headline: "Trump backs down on Iran threat, Claims of Negotitations Denied by Tehran" NYT tends to be excessively charitable with what Trump does and says. This is because it's more import
38.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
How is the NYT not totally biased in favor of Trump? Trump says insane thing, instead of repeating insane thing NYT rewrites it in a format that sounds like something a sane person says. Here's an example where NYT totally disregards t
39.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
>Trump's constant warmongering against Cuba has given China the opportunity to put a bunch of spy stations on the island. These kinds of claims would really benefit from additional information regarding the nature of such spy statio
40.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
>For example, speech that may harm others, such as inciting violence or maybe the most famous example: "Shouting FIRE in a full venue". Perhaps a misquote from 1919 wartime supreme court decision involving an anti-draft activis
41.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
>Scandinavian law is commonly considered to be a subcategory of civil law Their judiciaries are very different from how you describe civil law systems. >Judges in Scandinavia have investigative powers and can judge the truth of the ma
42.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
You understand that these aren't typically public, right? There's not any particularly good mechanism to discover abuse in this system in the first place, because the checks and balances are largely left to the requesting state.
43.
by ohhman11 7mo ago
>According to whom? You? According to the European Convention on Human Rights, it's sort of the whole point.