Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ohgodplsno
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
91.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
Every request first goes through "trusted attesters" (read: Google and pretty much Google alone) along with some information about your device (hardware information, browser data, executable hash, etc) for them to sign it and deci
92.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
Absolute and utter bullshit, and you know it. Sam Altman is always in for a single person: himself. I have never seen less altruistic, less simple to understand than him [0]. Everything, the world ID, the money, the coins, is just a pretens
93.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
You could go out, network, go to hiring fairs and various places. At which point you're pretty much always going to be asked for a LinkedIn, and pretty much noone will want to put work in for someone not doing something has simple as c
94.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
Irrelevant and based on very specific US salaries (actually, no, US tech hub salaries), along with absolutely no guarantee of having talented developers even at prices above. Otherwise, Google would be filled with talented developers, and w
95.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
Here's how this goes: WEI randomly fails, website sees it, has never implemented any error checking (or fails on purpose without WEI), WEI becomes effectively mandatory. Google is a gun manufacturer telling people on the other end of i
96.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
>Wouldn't you hire someone that puts that in their resume? To most employers, that would read as "prone to insubordination", and be an immediate red flag. Because each and every one of them will inevitably ask you to do so
97.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
Thank you for proving my points: small to medium businesses do not see me as a person either, but as a customer. They don't care if it's @oh_god_pls_no spending 100 bucks, or @arghwhat spending 100 bucks. We're both just a wa
98.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
>Attribution is not about personalization. Alright, let's see the next senten- >It's about proving to advertisement customers that their ads were seen and were useful. So, it's about making sure that the ads that they s
99.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
>advertisers - the companies trying to reach you - wants. They would most likely prefer ways that didn't bug you, as they want happy customers. They don't give a single shit about my happiness, as long as I buy their product. W
100.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
>Attribution is necessary for advertising to work at all. No, attribution is what advertisers want, to do the least amount of work possible to blast you with ads that attack your deepest weaknesses, all under the pretense of "person
101.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
* Spend 44 billion because of memes * Fire 90% of the workforce * Get clowned on every day on the very platform you own * Lose half of your advertising revenue because you insist on platforming fascists * Destroy any brand recognition you h
102.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
I'm just going to quote the updated, follow up article: The Brave Search API does not respect the site's licensing, and Brave is under the assumption that 1) because they are a search engine and 2) because they attribute the URI o
103.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
The same Brave that is selling data for AI companies, which may or may not include personal data ? I'd say it's probably not a good day for Brave advocacy. Neither is any other day.
104.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
Yes, misuse and misappropriation of funds is such an uncommon event for fortune 500 companies. Especially the CEO, they have to justify every little expense! In what wonder world are you living?
105.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
"My favorite multinational trillion dollar worth conglomerate that has a history of not caring about human rights when it comes to the production of their devices surely would never do that!" You're naïve. Less than 100 years
106.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
You lack creativity. You have multiple billions available for that. Where do you want your remains to disappear ? Hell, even sharks with lasers isn't far fetched with that amount of money. But all playfulness aside: * Pay professional
107.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
It's true, they merely have enough cash on hand to fund a small army, enough legal power to crush you in court with anything you attempt. Make no mistake: if Apple needed to get someone killed, they would. They're not some miracul
108.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
Go to your local supermarket and start selling things, let's see how long until you get kicked out by security. If Valve says no, Dolphin doesn't come out on Steam. If Valve says "ask Nintendo", and Nintendo says no, Dol
109.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
"It's legal" is about the most basic, dogshit argument you can ever use. When there are livelihoods at stake, when we have emails of execs explicitly wanting to wait it out so their writers get evicted, when Bob Iger makes th
110.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
You seem to misunderstand what unionisation is. The current state of things has been reached as kind of a gentleman's agreement. If employers want to revert to life threatening solutions, unions will revert to life threatening solution
111.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
If you think all LVMH workers have good working conditions, or that materials are sourced ethically, I have bad news for you. Quality doesn't prevent the search of profit maximization. Hell, luxury goods aren't even about quality.
112.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
It's actually an amazing way of being hostile towards said service. - Using up their resources, for free, while looking like one of their clients - Not displaying any of their ads, costing them even more - If they want to stop this, th
113.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
It's going to sound crazy, but "The Profession As A Whole Are Bastards But That Doesn't Mean Each Individual Cop Is" rolls off the tongue a little bit less well. ACAB doesn't mean that your cop neighbor that raises
114.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
You've built up your very own strawman, and are arguing with it. ACAB is not "deeply connected" to defunding the police. And it's not also a solution to a problem: it's an opinion, a observation of facts. All cops a
115.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
You do understand that private companies, as a whole, are a drain on the academic system, pushing to lower the very taxes that fund this research ? Society should benefit from these results. The 5000th LLM-haiku-generator-saas-company-incor
116.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
I do. And I also don't use open-source software with a commercial license for my job, because I respect the wishes of the author. It doesn't make the projects, tools and libraries any less good. OP is just looking to quickly cash
117.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
Less excited that you can't freely take work from academics to resell it in a shitty SaaS company ?
118.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
>Nice: 5h30 by train, 5h by car Closer to 4h30 by car, although the train does drop you off directly in Part-Dieu. Still, this doesn't take into account the need to go to the train station. >Nantes: 4h50 by train, 6h45 by car Fro
119.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
Because they live here, and because particle pollution and sound pollution actively kills people. Additionally, these roads were built assuming low amounts of traffic. To continue on with your logic: why are pedestrians complaining that I&#
120.
▲
by
ohgodplsno
3y ago
To be completely fair, Paris is an exception. France is an unbelievably centralised country, and everything goes to Paris. Bordeaux is similarly well served, but past that... Good luck in the southeast and its broken 80km/h lines, good
More ›