ofou

59 ms·

751.
Neuralink Update – September 2021(youtube.com)
2 points by ofou 5y ago|0 comments
752.
Poll: Will Neuralink (someday) be the next iPhone?
3 points by ofou 5y ago|2 comments
753.
by ofou 5y ago
Yes
754.
by ofou 5y ago
No
755.
by ofou 5y ago
can you share the pdf?
756.
by ofou 5y ago
I built it using pdfhtml from source and it generated this PDF. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VmkJiazNRXel1s6mN57CoJOZhli... Not the cleanest one, but better than nothing.
757.
by ofou 5y ago
here are the instructions https://jupyterbook.org/advanced/pdf.html
758.
by ofou 5y ago
Cool to see you bought the book, hope you enjoy the read! There's a ton evidence in the book itself. Happy to keep the conversation going!
759.
Neuralink and the Brain's Magical Future by Tim Urban(docs.google.com)
2 points by ofou 5y ago|0 comments
760.
by ofou 5y ago
any good open source one?
761.
by ofou 5y ago
Insecticides are the main vector of attack of course, they're designed for that. The problem is not identifying properly other substantial vectors. As a hobbyist beekeeper can confirm the impact of EM pollution. EM fields are a big dea
762.
by ofou 5y ago
This is a must read. Also the 5G appeal in europe, over 230 scientists from more than 40 countries have expressed their “serious concerns” regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices al
763.
by ofou 5y ago
I disagree. Marie Curie doesn't realized "the hurt" as a test, for sure. Nobody is talking just about the brain either, pesticides are a huge part of the equation, it's a no brainer. But EM pollution is not easily dismis
764.
by ofou 5y ago
Nobody said a definitive conclusion or statement, but this is an overlooked AND significant one. I'm not an environmental scientist either, but I do see evidence of this point as a hobbyist beekeeper and casual reader of the science li
765.
by ofou 5y ago
I pin it because there's evidence. What are you suggesting as the main cause?
766.
by ofou 5y ago
we don't know the long term impact on health of almost anything, weird times we're living.
767.
Apple Event – September 14(youtube.com)
1 points by ofou 5y ago|0 comments
768.
by ofou 5y ago
I think people speak this subject too anthropocentric here, the real problem is EM pollution at a massive and unprecedented scale is making the insect population collapse. All of that, without mentioning the lack of methods and funding to s
769.
by ofou 5y ago
I think Elizabeth Kolbert with her book "The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History" did a great job on the overall subject. "Mobile phone and Wi-Fi radiation in particular opens the calcium channels in certain cells, meaning
770.
by ofou 5y ago
A cross-validated one.
771.
by ofou 5y ago
Gamma radiation in-vivo cells have been shown to produce "a reduction in cell division; alteration in the ratio of the different phases of mitosis, and the appearance of degenerate cells in the germinative zone." [1] Also Le Pogam
772.
Is This Retina? – DPI/PPI Display Calculator(designcompaniesranked.com)
1 points by ofou 5y ago|0 comments
773.
by ofou 5y ago
I would not dismiss so easily the potential environmental hazards of electromagnetic pollution. It's not just about humans, but whole ecosystems. Starting by insect population collapse. BTW, even if you think those applications are not
774.
by ofou 5y ago
They reached the brain. [1] [1]: https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/123456789/1059...
775.
by ofou 5y ago
That's the problem with Conspiracy theories, people tend to polarize in order to avoid being flagged as such. I think that, indepently whatever you think about 5G and its implications. It's a new tech, and it must be studied thoro
776.
by ofou 5y ago
Great point!
777.
by ofou 5y ago
The paper did a great job raising concerns about the limits of gel simulants to study potential health hazards. The '5G bad' is pointless. More studies are needed, specifically about the environment impact. Electromagnetic polluti
778.
by ofou 5y ago
Can you provide some context why do you think this is a big deal? I'm not an expert, but I'm really interested.
779.
by ofou 5y ago
Plus the limits of gel simulants to estimate potential hazards.
780.
by ofou 5y ago
The problem that I see, it's that gel simulants are ineffective as a proxy to estimate health hazards for regulating this subject.

More ›