4 ms·

I disagree. Marie Curie doesn't realized "the hurt" as a test, for sure. Nobody is talking just about the brain either, pesticides are a huge part of the equa

by ofou 5y ago

I disagree. Marie Curie doesn't realized "the hurt" as a test, for sure. Nobody is talking just about the brain either, pesticides are a huge part of the equation, it's a no brainer. But EM pollution is not easily dismissible. You know, this is the problem with the subject, people should talk a lot more about possible long-term implications of every new tech deployed. Peer reviewing is a slow process, I'm happy that there's at least research being conducted seriously.

jiggawatts 5y ago
Evidence for the ignorance of other people when faced with novel phenomena is not evidence that we are ignorant of all phenomena. Just because some things are a mystery to you, doesn't make them have mysterious properties. Microwaves cause heating. That's why we have an appliance that generates them in our kitchens. Heating is nice, to a point, afterwards it's very obvious that it's too much. No mobile phone, has anywhere, ever, burnt someone through microwave radiation. Not 3G, not 4G, not 5G, not any # G. The power levels are just too low. It's like trying to do a spot weld with a laser pointer. Meanwhile, high-power radar has warning signs on it, because -- duh -- it's powerful enough to cause burns: https://www.safetysign.com/rf-warning-signs https://www.safetysign.com/rf-warning-signs It's not some magical property of radar or 5G that does this! It's just the power level. No mystery. You turn it down... you don't get hurt.