octavecat

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by octavecat 14y ago

   To me it is the sad state of "design" in the valley that means "ux people are figuring out what is not important." To label them and give them a role implies that others in the org should not be thinking about this at all times. everyone sh
2. 2.▲
   by octavecat 14y ago

   step 1: actually do something and stop doing things related to the topic of doing something. step 2: keep doing that.
3. 3.▲
   by octavecat 14y ago

   yeah, exactly. as a dev i'm just solidly impressed with the experiment. it seems like a fun project someone decided to tackle and did so quite well. what i think most of us want now is for the author to take it to the next level and make
4. 4.▲
   by octavecat 14y ago

   controversial as in it's an undesirable, irreversible interaction that really turns people off and critics of dcurtis's "work" were more than happy to speak out about it.