Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
obius_prime
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
1.
▲
A Harness for Claude Code
(euleptos.com)
3 points
by
obius_prime
5mo ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
by
obius_prime
8mo ago
https://github.com/Cosmolalia/akataleptos-geodesic-constants... thank you for the contribution :)
3.
▲
by
obius_prime
8mo ago
Yes, We already have one candidate: sin²(2θ₁₂) = √(S/r) ≈ 0.845.
4.
▲
by
obius_prime
8mo ago
https://github.com/Cosmolalia/akataleptos-geodesic-constants... https://github.com/Cosmolalia/akataleptos-geodesic-constants... We present observational and computational evidence that the large-s
5.
▲
by
obius_prime
8mo ago
https://quantummarmelade.substack.com/p/thirteen-constants-f... quantummarmelade.substack.com/p/capellini-geodesic-extrusion-felting https://github.com/Cosmolalia/akataleptos-geodesic-con
6.
▲
Thirteen Constants from Zero Free Parameters? What Did I Find?
(quantummarmelade.substack.com)
1 points
by
obius_prime
8mo ago
|
4 comments
7.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
https://quantummarmelade.substack.com/p/capellini-geodesic-e...
8.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
shit, bad link, how can i update it?
9.
▲
Capellini Geodesic Extrusion Felting: Constants emerge from dimensional collapse
(substack.com)
2 points
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
|
3 comments
10.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
Following up on yesterday's resonance chamber post with a deeper finding. I ran hierarchical analysis: only 23% of peak ratios match algebraic combinations of constants. Not "peaks everywhere" — a specific structure. But the
11.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
Have you engaged with the material?
12.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
Ran hierarchical analysis. At 1% tolerance, 23% of ratios match algebraic combinations of constants (harmonics, products, ratios). 77% unexplained. We're not finding constants everywhere — we're finding a specific ~23% algebraic s
13.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
You're right — that script (hamiltonian_perfect_finder) IS a parameter search tool. It will find matches to whatever targets you give it. That's not the core claim. The core claim is in the white noise tests and the basic resonanc
14.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
Fucking sick! Dude, this is awesome you ran the code! I'm truly humbled if this is real.
15.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
Holy... i hadn't noticed the speed of light thing!...collab with me if you like. i'm super stoked for engagement , even if someone disproves it all. :) TY!
16.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
If anyone wants to collaborate or has questions or just wants to tell me off, my email is SylvanGaskin@gmail.com All are welcome. I'd tell myself off but ive done that already and it didn't help, i'm still doing this shit and
17.
▲
I Think I Found Something Weird About Physical Constants
(quantummarmelade.substack.com)
15 points
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
|
10 comments
18.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
Thanks but your critique doesn't change the science of it, run the math, confirm or deny, move on... simple equation really. If people want to argue with the science of it, be my guest and ill see you on the other side. Go do the math,
19.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
you can have valid math and credit those who helped, even if not human. whats actually sloppy is your refusal to engage with it in good faith. but you cant because if you did, youd have to come back and eat your hat.
20.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
the repo was set to private on accident. i corrected it.
21.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
check the math. certainly not slop.
22.
▲
Universal Constants Derived from Pure Geometry
(github.com)
3 points
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
|
9 comments
23.
▲
by
obius_prime
10mo ago
We just demonstrated that the “fundamental constants” of physics (the fine structure constant α ≈ 1/137, the mass ratios of particles, and mathematical constants like π and e) are not arbitrary numbers that need to be measured. They ar