oauea

31 ms·

331.
by oauea 5y ago
Good luck convincing all the couples who back up all their pictures by default to iCloud that those pictures are not private.
332.
by oauea 5y ago
You should take a look at the late TempleOS. It's not a serious contender but has a lot of interesting ideas in that direction
333.
by oauea 5y ago
Are you fine with an apple employee looking at all your private pictures just because some hashing algorithm decided you're a pedophile? Personally, I'm not.
334.
by oauea 5y ago
> As fir other data, they don't gather it directly from the people about whom they keep files. Sounds unethical.
335.
by oauea 5y ago
It's just an idiom[1]: > To be confident in or convinced about something's viability, veracity, etc., often to the point of being enthusiastically supportive of it. People on HN seem excited about it. I wanted to learn why, and
336.
by oauea 5y ago
Looks like this software does not comply with EU regulations about refunds. > The registration information is not refundable because it is a short string and easy to copy. We cannot accept any refund requests for it. Please try this sof
337.
by oauea 5y ago
Can someone "sell me" on Deno? I'm still not sure why I should be interested in this versus for example NodeJS. Most of the features it lists seem rather dubious. > Secure by default. No file, network, or environment acces
338.
by oauea 5y ago
You're speculating on "why" they're punished. I ask for "how". How is someone posting a link punished?
339.
by oauea 5y ago
Can you explain how they're punished?
340.
by oauea 5y ago
How about just adding a permission to the already present permission system? Oh, that's right. Google and Apple don't trust their users and want full control over everyone's devices.
341.
by oauea 5y ago
Oh yikes, Google is going down the Apple path of forbidding downloaded code? That's awful. How long until third party web browsers are banned on Android as well?
342.
by oauea 5y ago
You do realize that Google is not the government? What do taxes have to do with anything?
343.
by oauea 5y ago
Yes, I could've tweeted that. What's your point? Are you convinced my comment was an attempt at deep thought? I guess on twitter it might've been considered as such?
344.
by oauea 5y ago
> they were just interested in convincing enough people that it was possible for long enough to get rich quickly. A million times this. I used to be a huge bitcoin fan in the early days. It's become obvious that it's failed and
345.
by oauea 5y ago
The topic of cryptocurrency scams? Don't need to a waste a lot of words on that thankfully :-)
346.
by oauea 5y ago
Ah yes those 280 character tweets lend themselves extremely well to deep thought.
347.
by oauea 5y ago
They're all scams.
348.
by oauea 5y ago
I don't think we should be using Youtube as a model for anything.
349.
by oauea 5y ago
Oh good, it will remain available at the low, low price of half a million per year. That soothes my worries entirely.
350.
by oauea 5y ago
Interesting how that shields them from any and all government transparency.
351.
by oauea 5y ago
Literally never had anything break due to upgrades in the ~7 years I've used docker (on Linux), but ok. Do you have any examples? They renamed some packages a few times but no big deal, just uninstall the old ones and reinstall the new
352.
by oauea 5y ago
"Oh no, I have to update my software!" Are you serious?
353.
by oauea 5y ago
That's great but irrelevant. This discussion is about scanning them locally on your device.
354.
by oauea 5y ago
Once it finally loaded all I saw was icons and no text. Bizarre and not very usable. Stick to code.
355.
by oauea 5y ago
> So only the guilty (and the false positives) would worry. If you truly want to "protect the children" you should have no issue for the police to visit and inspect your, and all of your neighbors houses. Every few days. Unanno
356.
by oauea 5y ago
Why just your basement? While they're there they might kindly ask you to unlock that computer or hand over that phone. Just to make sure, of course.
357.
by oauea 5y ago
Wait, so two American companies, Apple and NCMEC, are working together to install spyware on all Apple devices world-wide, with no government involvement?
358.
by oauea 5y ago
It's a fair point for any service. If the service doesn't actually provide a service they can control concurrent access to, then it doesn't cost them anything. So you're literally just trying to scam your customers. Gros
359.
by oauea 5y ago
So why is it in there and why do they care?
360.
by oauea 5y ago
Not an American, but shouldn't you be able to FOIA this?

More ›