oaiey

7 ms·

121.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Not everyone is build robust enough for being called a monkey or loser straight into the person's face.
122.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Came here to say that. Killed my curiosity towards Zig in an instant. What a disrespect. A pity. Saw Zig as something rising but with this kind of toxicity, no thanks.
123.
by oaiey 11mo ago
By a factor of 1000. Unreal.
124.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Is not that the core problem with ORMs. All of them. In the end you do straight SQL when it comes to Performance.
125.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Rust is a tool not for application development. It has a huge space in drivers, renderers and other low level places. Node and Python are dynamically typed and at least originally scripting focused. They are not the right choice for many de
126.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Numbers are inflated not by choice but by force. Node is not a choice but a consequence of frontend heavy work. And JavaScript was made good using typescript by the guy who also created C#. Same goes with Python with its data science and ML
127.
by oaiey 11mo ago
It has the benefit of being late to the game (like .NET was to Java).
128.
by oaiey 11mo ago
.NET Framework had back then, when it was not in frozen state as it is now, every release a list of breaking changes. Modern .NET breaking changes are not worth talking about. Keeping up with the state of the art however is more interesting
129.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Or users of other programming tool chains.
130.
by oaiey 11mo ago
I think .NET is way beyond the situation that they question their open source move. The amount of pull requests and positive outcomes for them in the last 10 years (yeah that long already) is mind blowing.
131.
by oaiey 11mo ago
I remember these days. But I have to say: .NET Core and .NET 5+ are awesome. They bring this ease you speak about into the cloud, into Linux, into containers. Obviously with the notable exception of UI development, but there the landscape h
132.
by oaiey 11mo ago
I think the word government agency is key here :)
133.
by oaiey 11mo ago
There is no way a reasonable person would not deploy to Linux and postgres for cost reasons alone. No one wants to pay Microsoft or Oracle money for databases, operating systems or frameworks nowadays.
134.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Most of .NET is.
135.
by oaiey 11mo ago
.NET Framework was always called .NET Framework and not renamed from NET 4 to .NET Framework. There was a time where .NET was applied as a prefix/suffix to everything Microsoft released. Microsoft Windows Server .NET. that had nothing
136.
by oaiey 11mo ago
No. Was hard enough to convince people of .NET Core away from the .NET Framework. Adding a completely different name and I would have several hundred java devs now instead of beautiful .net 10 on Linux.
137.
by oaiey 11mo ago
I agree. For Blazor there is hope. It is standard based (web assembly, HTML, css) and it feels very intuitive particularly when compared to other spa frameworks like react. Also you can reuse all your html, css and design systems you have.
138.
by oaiey 11mo ago
The answer to that is well known: Windows division builds WinUI/Win32 as their native C++/COM API, Office division went to React on their path to the web and the dev division fills gaps (WPF) and provides tools for external and in
139.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Can only confirm that. Such a smooth platform overall for web and API development. We use it with several 100 devs on it and the choice never failed us, neither in technology or hiring. And it is not that we have .NET gurus or anything.
140.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Today :)
141.
by oaiey 1y ago
A lot of good news recently for swift. I am a bit jealous as my go to language C# / .NET is recently not announcing fancy things. I really like swift going beyond Apple. Particularly the port to android is IMHO crucial, however, now th
142.
by oaiey 1y ago
I do not know why people still think Tesla is a unique company. They are a regular car company now. Nothing more, nothing less. Yes, they disrupted the market and the reward is a standalone, viable car company. That is a huge achievement. B
143.
by oaiey 1y ago
I think it is good advice for everyone. Pre Texting, Pre Email in the 90s I believe this kind of work was normal. All this self motivated, hyper context switching jobs we all do are relatively new compared to human evolvement. And we see th
144.
by oaiey 1y ago
I think it started with an interrupt. And less abstraction often wins.
145.
by oaiey 1y ago
I am reading the book Children of Time where descendents of mankind try to keep their tech running long after the ship started. We are now coming into an age in which standing application and infrastructure systems have to run long past the
146.
by oaiey 1y ago
And for simple reasons: no experiments in tech stack. No friction in hiring. Static typing (which sorts out JS and Python) and then you are there.
147.
by oaiey 1y ago
Swift is a nice for one use case. The use cases outnumber the popularity in that niche.
148.
by oaiey 1y ago
Yes. Companies with existing workforces are doing new software all the time. If you have a workforce with let us say 100 devs. Even if you hire 10 new ones temporarily or permanent, you for sure tell them: use what the other 100 do. It is n
149.
by oaiey 1y ago
As a liberal/conservative European I definitely support that US companies have to search harder locally and do less outsourcing. As a employee of a company who merged many years ago with an US company I should probably search for a new
150.
by oaiey 1y ago
This looks like a huge release for C# and Java I guess. Half of the features are useful elements they no longer have to polyfill.

More ›