4 ms·
Came here to say that. Killed my curiosity towards Zig in an instant. What a disrespect. A pity. Saw Zig as something rising but with this kind of toxicity, no
by oaiey 11mo ago
Came here to say that. Killed my curiosity towards Zig in an instant. What a disrespect.
A pity. Saw Zig as something rising but with this kind of toxicity, no thanks.
- sgt 11mo agoIt's probably a lapse, don't read into it too much. You can't expect people to tip toe around. Just give him feedback.
- carlmr 11mo ago>A pity. Saw Zig as something rising but with this kind of toxicity, no thanks. Don't get me wrong, it is a bit toxic. However, I feel like taking one comment in a larger article and blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic.
- amake 11mo ago> blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic One person decided that something wasn't for them. How is that in the same league as someone in a leadership position being unprofessional?
- carlmr 11mo agoI personally don't care too much for hierarchies, so I didn't factor this in. You can be toxic at any level.
- amake 11mo ago> You can be toxic at any level And yet the context is extremely important. > I didn't factor this in That's how you get to false equivalencies.
- carlmr 11mo ago>That's how you get to false equivalencies. No, you're just putting something into it which doesn't matter to me. Not a false equivalency.
- amake 11mo agoYou said: > blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic Making a false equivalency of the supposed toxicity of the commenter's post and the toxicity displayed in the article. You can just take the L; you don't have to be performatively obtuse about it.