oaiey

8 ms·

91.
by oaiey 9mo ago
JD Vance business is a protection racket. That is how I read it
92.
by oaiey 9mo ago
I share that perspective. Being an international company is a challenging thing regards law. You have to operate in best intent, and judges respect that. And sure, some laws and most likely this one, are stupid. I always take GDPR as an exa
93.
by oaiey 10mo ago
Well there are really bad languages. Like ABAP or SQL. But even in higher languages like Java, you sometimes loose expressiveness
94.
by oaiey 10mo ago
I think you stretch this library thought a bit too far :)
95.
by oaiey 10mo ago
See C#'s asp.net core minimal apis (a express clone). So it is definitely possible but you need to co-develop the language. I think as you point out.
96.
by oaiey 10mo ago
I agree. c# and asp.net core also co-developed. Interestingly in both direction, towards users (tons of type inference, removing boilerplate, ...) and system (writing highly optimized web servers with low level paradigms)
97.
by oaiey 10mo ago
While I agree with WTH on branding and everything, I never understood the "Office App". Excel, Powerpoint, Word .... all fine. OneDrive/Sharepoint ... absolutely. But the Office App was for me always just the app for the tota
98.
by oaiey 10mo ago
Office not so much I think. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Outlook ... totally. But Office is just a packaging name no one uses day to day.
99.
by oaiey 10mo ago
Which is the exact mistake they are repeating right now. Force one brand on everything, even if it has nothing to do with it.
100.
by oaiey 10mo ago
I think it misses a .net in the end. Oh wait, this naming mistake they already made like 25 years ago. Funny how their learnt nothing out of their own mistakes. Today their CEO released a statement that people should focus not on AI but on
101.
by oaiey 10mo ago
Do you have a comparison to other libraries like https://github.com/louthy/language-ext Yours looks a lot more idiomatic to C# (hence acceptable for a mixed code base) but the above linked more "systematic".
102.
by oaiey 10mo ago
Yes. Or even simpler, static imported functions. That is similar to how ASP.NET Core handles HTTP feedback. A very common and understood concept. With implicit type parameters this boils down to Ok(4) or BadRequest()
103.
by oaiey 10mo ago
This article can be summarized as: description of doing software development in a sizeable enterprise not a startup. From where I know: living and breathing like it for the last 19 years
104.
by oaiey 10mo ago
They adopted gdpr some years ago. This goes further and creates infrastructure to delete records at scale. I hope this is good and turns global. We need this, because consent banners do not work.
105.
by oaiey 10mo ago
Keeping commander keen alive should be a priority project for humanity!
106.
by oaiey 10mo ago
Exactly. This is a pointless discussion. Just a badly executed legal change. Good that they are reminded that they have to stick to the law, but for consumers practically there is no change.
107.
by oaiey 10mo ago
That is neither regulation (just standard contract law) and IMHO a formality, because Amazon could have just formulated it differently: hey we terminate your contract, next offer: same thing with ads (vs. Hey we change the contract for prof
108.
by oaiey 10mo ago
I believe the same: everyone wants to be in New York / Munich / pick your local fashionable place. Everyone moves there to be someone. But not everyone can be someone, so there are a lot of unhappy / selfish people.
109.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Nothing is absolutely true, but in this case definitely
110.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Yeah, bad behaviors of others does not excuse yours.
111.
by oaiey 11mo ago
It is politeness, not political correctness. He represented his community with insulting words to the world. In higher ranks of IT it is all about communication. With his lack of proper words he showed these leaders, who decide about the ad
112.
by oaiey 11mo ago
He acknowledged. Linked in the article.
113.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Question: would you go to a public place and call a person who is listening to you a loser or a monkey with the risk of getting your face smashed in? Companies do public announcement with the risk of getting sued left and right. Normal peop
114.
by oaiey 11mo ago
[..] in a product not people. Insulting people is never a solution.
115.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Well, it was comparing people with monkeys and calling them losers. It was a straightforward personal insult. Writing something online in a blog is like making a public announcement on a market with 100s listening. No one except someone who
116.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Came here to write that. Let us recognize that he accepted our feedback and improved. This is good.
117.
by oaiey 11mo ago
He shot the wrong entity.
118.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Exactly. I have not finished reading the post. And I never will. It destroys the message and the reputation
119.
by oaiey 11mo ago
I have not finished the post because of the tone at the beginning. IT at higher ranks is about people. This post disqualifies Zig as an org.
120.
by oaiey 11mo ago
Not everyone is that robust. People get hurt over things like that. Not everyone is a wizard who does not give a fuck and does not need to care. These are people for God's sake. Empathy!

More ›