Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
oaiey
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
I think he confuses longhorn with Singularity research project.
62.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
The article is presenting some stuff mixed up. Had nothing to do with the language or the framework. WinFS was a database product. Over engineered and abstract. .NET and C# were researched a lot for operating system usage (Midori, Singulari
63.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Spot on.
64.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
As a long term observer: definitely not a goal. But you have to be clear here: JavaScript and C# both are OO languages, both are having origins stories in Java/C++, both are facing the same niche (system development), same challenges (
65.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Sweet. Alternatives are always something good.
66.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
It will not survive. No point in maintaining both. Just costs money. Device management for mobile phones is also a huge point. My educated guess: tablet/laptop hybrids with Android OS. Not that Apple has huge success with the same move
67.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
As someone who has benefiter ones from this, I have to say: good. In my humble opinion: the current state is better than no encryption at all. For example: Laptop theft, scavengers trying to find pictures, etc. And if you think you are targ
68.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
With higher salaries (is happening) and better quality of life (I do not know, do not life there). Within company obviously quality of the culture matters there. However considering how things are worldwide right now, I think that trend sto
69.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Particular topic (1) is also trained in cross cultural trainings. Another topic is: do not expect a remote dev to pickup ambient knowledge, particular if they are juniors with no life experience. And since outsourcing to India is trying to
70.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
The intro is legendary
71.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
I think humans and spiders and octopus and viruses are for him just a background for the object he wants to narrate. In difference to many other fiction where the persons are the objects. I also missed a human part of it.
72.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Yeah, but I can hate my neighbor for his reckless business behavior but fully trust him in saving my house if the yard burns. Trust and liking someone are very different things.
73.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Or you just setup lower price limits for cars like Europe did with China. So that state support is not affecting the market. Because guess what: producing a car in far far away land and then ship it around the world and pay some 10% tariff
74.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
I do not see any empty fields left and right. Despite farmers complaining since 30 years about every single trade deal. Honestly I have not seen an unused field ever. And as long the fields are producing food this is just a change in income
75.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
It is a trade deal. It is always bad for some, good for others. We are at a crossroads if we continue with globalism in the remaining world or if everyone is on its own. I prefer the first. The EU, Canada, Japan/Korea/other Asian
76.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Both are not friend of EU/Canada right now. But China at least never pretended (or we never saw them like that). The US however was a factual savior, then a close ally and a partner for 85 years! That is roughly 60 years longer than Ch
77.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Bush was trusted in Europe. We never felt that he betrayed Europe. There were tough trade deals and stupid wars, but there was never doubt we could rely on the US in this times. It was fine. This started with Trump and Project 2025 and wha
78.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
I do not believe that. Project 2025 was a documented plan and is executed. Someone is profiting of that. So the outcomes are what was the plan. Question is: will it suck for the general population. Answer is yes
79.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
That will not be that easy this time. Too direct is the elemination of any international collaboration a result of the Trump / Project 2025 leadership.
80.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Yeah, but it does not have to. There are for example products like keycloak. OpenID/OAuth2/Token/Security IdP in a box. Why there is not ticket system in a box? Yeah, we all know Jira and friends, but these are products not b
81.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
They have all right to sanction or restrict a company which has a legal footprint in their territory. When you are incorporating as a company in a country you are subject to their laws. Period. If that includes rules how you act worldwide,
82.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Well the law is surely addressing European/Italian citizens and business. If you serve them from the US and target Italians for financial gain, you are no longer extraterritorial because you operate there as a business.
83.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Doing business is different in the EU as it is different in China or Russia. If you want it to be not different, work in globalization not America first. Europe was fine until it got disrupted by Russia and the US. But that has nothing to d
84.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
A bit naive concerning the leaks of 15 years ago. NSA cooperation with big tech is very well known.
85.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
You are right. But there is a point here that international harmonization and compromise is a solution here. Which is not exactly a strength of an America First policy.
86.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
He took a risk in ignoring a law instead of exiting the market. They did not escalate, they applied the law. What we need is an international legal framework for the Internet. And that includes compromises on all sides. China, EU, Russia, U
87.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
The panel is backed by a law. Respect the law. Italy has a judicial system and in cases like this, probably some EU court could be also called. US politicians can reach out to EU/Italian politics to harmonize trade... But wait, do not
88.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Yeah correct. I hate this so much in this topic. I hate the disrespect for the law in this topic here but he is right here. The Olympics, soccer and all the other sports (but also other billionaires businesses) have to be put back in their
89.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
When the risks are too high, then exit the market. When you do business in a market, adhere to the laws there. It is however the business of governments to foster harmonized (globalized) markets. But the US has killed so many regulations an
90.
▲
by
oaiey
9mo ago
Thank they should act like it and respect the laws of the countries. If you run to the US executive to assert US understanding of law onto other countries you are geopolitical important, however, as a tool for the US national interest not a
More ›