Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
oaiey
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
631.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
I hate the idea that a community is only on topics. Humans are wholesome things. A certain percentage off-topic is cool.
632.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
I came here to say the opposite: The folder icons ... a mess. Dynamic spacing depending how long the folder name is, free style sorting, "arranging", ... that is a lot of things but not a folder system ;) .. maybe a "desktop&
633.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
Fair on baseless and theory but conspiracy?
634.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
Let me play devil's advocate here: Could it be that these keys were forced out of these companies by governments and used for their spying business ... and then got lost somewhere there (where the incentives of protecting them is not t
635.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
That is most likely a general tactic. If you are an early adopter, you also carry the initial extra cost. Take exoskeleton, gene therapy, ... whatever. When they fight it for ... let us say ... 10 years, the cost has gone significantly down
636.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
The problem is essentially the following: in a know-all situation (prototype, reduced domain, startup,..) situation it is easy to ditch the 90%. No sync needed, no docs needed, no tests needed, ... Once you scale up to large systems (ignore
637.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
Very foolish to use benchmarking as marketing. Yes, it is very convenient (as a .NET fanboy I appreciate to have something where .NET is outperforming others) but hack, the next framework can just outperform you while you do your presentati
638.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
Let us face it: Self-optimization is an addiction. And addiction you need to treat.
639.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
All I read is that you are trying to achieve some more goals. Try to do something without goals. Buy a videogame and play a bit. Buy a basketball and throw some baskets. Go swimming. Without a goal!
640.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
But do not focus on the health aspect of it. No more goals. Do it for fun. To play with people.
641.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
And what is the difference to SMTP? That is literally the decentralized messaging platform which is alive for 40 (?) years and still kicking. There will be problems but there is evidence that it can work.
642.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
It is called early adopters. As in: in the 80s (??) A random admin wrote a well written email and got what he wanted for free. Now they are worth millions.
643.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
Switch off Tor. You are in the dark net.
644.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
I not at all advocate that. Total opposite actually. All I am saying is: at some days I work 15 minutes longer and on others 15 minutes shorter. Same work quantity with the difference that I stop working at a meaningful point and not let ev
645.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
This is a nuance i do not appreciate. There is a difference in working 40h +/- 2h a week (which i do since 10 years) and punching out after exactly 8 hours. No work finished exactly on time.
646.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
Dissing because of clippy: fair game :)
647.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
SAFe is agile process for the R&D management level and not on team level (where it is effectively a 3 months waterfall). This analogy never fails me. SAFe brings tools and benefits on that level. For everyone below, it is waterfall pain
648.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
The expression part or the extension method part? (Obviously: No clue about Kotlin, just interested)
649.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
Very true. Most agile principles are optimized to squeeze the most out of everyone. There is no space for breathing.
650.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
I have been through the same. Caring less, working 40 hours and nevertheless, productivity went up. Work is a tool to enable your private life. Not the other way around.
651.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
it is actually one of the better ones in the field.
652.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
They lost me at unmanaged. For fun but also practical. When you have a workload with more than 1GB throughput, planning your network is a thing. And then having an unmanaged thingy is just not appealing.
653.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
I would be careful with the body temperature statement :)
654.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
We live in a post UML landscape, nevertheless diagramming methods like state machines, activity and sequence diagrams, class and component diagrams are used everywhere. And the ones not using them miss out. We should start respecting these
655.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
That is definitely personality based. Pair programming has an aspect of wasted time but it depends on the local culture.
656.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
Do not worry. Your every day startup may not (because their teenager culture), but the enterprises of the world love you. I am now crossing in my mid forties, being a paper dragon (architect) I still outperform the waste majority of develop
657.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
The idealized greybeard would consider effective pair programming as wasted time (there is no contribution by the pair). And all other purposes (like training juniors) is not for immediate benefit.
658.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
I find the gdpr is much easier to read than this.
659.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
LINQ creates an AST in the .NET land, however, before passing it to an actual SQL database, it serializes the expression tree to SQL. So no, it does not talk AST to the database.
660.
▲
by
oaiey
4y ago
C# LINQ does pass an expression tree into the abstraction before it will then serialize it SQL and then the database deserialize it into an AST. LINQ-to-Objects is in memory and works on the AST directly. Also both LINQ language syntax and
More ›