nyeah

10 ms·

181.
by nyeah 8mo ago
Sure. Either that or the reverse. "They're not the same" in the sense that they can't both be clockwise. "They are the same" in the sense that we could make either one clockwise.
182.
by nyeah 8mo ago
Exactly. So I feel like all the article really says is that "Complex numbers" doesn't necessarily tell you everything you need to know. It depends on what you're doing with them.
183.
by nyeah 8mo ago
I mean, fine, I guess? But on the other hand Meh. Article: "They form the complex field, of course, with the corresponding algebraic structure, but do we think of the complex numbers necessarily also with their smooth topological struc
184.
by nyeah 8mo ago
To be clear, this "disagreement" is about arbitrary naming conventions which can be chosen as needed for the problem at hand. It doesn't make any difference to results.
185.
by nyeah 8mo ago
Your version of events is not supported by the article. I think what you're calling "crazy" is due process itself.
186.
by nyeah 8mo ago
If he had been found to be here illegally, they would not need him to voluntarily consent to being deported. I hope that's obvious.
187.
by nyeah 8mo ago
(1) "Judge" is not necessarily identical with "due process." (2) Congress can't override constitutional protections by passing new laws. That would require a constitutional amendment.
188.
by nyeah 8mo ago
If he were here illegally, they wouldn't need him to agree to be deported.
189.
by nyeah 8mo ago
The man clearly states that he is here legally, under a work permit.
190.
by nyeah 8mo ago
Cannabis usage is linked to self-reported better cognitive function. But some new studies suggest it's not wise to do technical interviews while baked. Nobody can explain this paradox.
191.
by nyeah 9mo ago
Where did Cursor say that?
192.
by nyeah 9mo ago
The link [0] implies that the browser worked. Can you help me understand what's "conservative" about that?
193.
by nyeah 9mo ago
Ok, there probably are folks who can't differentiate between the Physics department and the Sociology department. Or who can tell the difference but who attack both anyway. The problem for science is those folks. Right? The universitie
194.
by nyeah 10mo ago
I understand that you want to answer your own question, not my question. That's fine.
195.
by nyeah 10mo ago
I checked your first example. It's from 1423, well outside the time period 500-1300. If you have valid examples, including the other works you mentioned above, please provide dates. I'm a little tired of doing that for people. Ado
196.
by nyeah 10mo ago
>Genuine monarchists are pretty rare in America. That was true once. Today Yarvin is massively influential. (I'm not explaining it, just reporting it.)
197.
by nyeah 10mo ago
Oh. My. God. Andrei Rublev, 1360-1430 ? This dude? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Rublev#/media/File:Rubl... Yeah he's good, that's obvious. Klimt cribbed from Rublev I bet. Naturalism was ne
198.
by nyeah 10mo ago
It's not nitpicking. 1450 is not between 500 and 1300. You may stress "about" but I certainly didn't. I put the cut-off at 1300 very intentionally. As soon as you go much past 1300, you start to see stuff like this htt
199.
by nyeah 10mo ago
On the other hand Texas seems to have a problem with it. But say you're right. Does "not a bad deal" make people enthusiastic about it? Why go out there and evangelize about a half-assed rewards card that comes with privacy l
200.
by nyeah 10mo ago
But I didn't really ask "why do some consumers prefer not to make certain unwanted features illegal"? I asked why some consumers are so wildly positive about being forced to adopt features they hate. Lemme example. In the we
201.
by nyeah 10mo ago
"A free market would be great and perfectly capable of serving the public. The problem is free market is a theoretical concept" How would we know the real-world properties of a theoretical concept from economics? We understand pie
202.
by nyeah 10mo ago
I've wondered about cognitive dissonance. Another "cog diss" possibility is, maybe I have a strong aversion to admitting that I'm getting screwed. Maybe I can relieve those feelings by arguing publicly that I'm not
203.
by nyeah 10mo ago
That may be a good point. But I don't think it's an answer to my question. My question was, Why do people get so passionate about being screwed? Say consumers really are receiving a $300 discount in exchange for being forced to wa
204.
by nyeah 10mo ago
I've given up asking for an example to support that.
205.
by nyeah 10mo ago
It's always amazing how many people plop anti-consumer comments out here. Like, of course you bastards deserve to be served ads on your own TV that you just paid $800 for. Because why? Because ... the market is wise, and "the mark
206.
by nyeah 10mo ago
Do you just want to generalize, or do you want to provide a counterexample? Fine either way.
207.
by nyeah 10mo ago
Fine, good point. Medieval paintings and drawings suck, but the pottery may have been incredible. Yeah, why sacrifice dignity by providing a counterexample? Dignity is important.
208.
by nyeah 10mo ago
"some anon on a tech forum" Don't sell yourself short. Post some art from those 800 years that doesn't suck, and I'll change my views. Sure, there's plenty of crap in 20th century art. I've seen example
209.
by nyeah 10mo ago
No need to generalize. Post some clear exceptions. Or if the statement turns out to be "utterly bizarre but correct" I'm fine with that.
210.
by nyeah 10mo ago
Sure, but for me the standard isn't whether it's visually realistic. Plenty of good stuff isn't particularly realistic. Traditional Chinese landscapes aren't realistic, but a lot of them are great. David Hockney has a lo

More ›