nyeah

4 ms·

31.
by nyeah 2mo ago
Yeah. "Hate": https://www.kapwing.com/blog/why-does-the-public-hate-the-te... Re the linked piece, I'm concerned about people saying "they hate us" when they really mean "they disagree wit
32.
by nyeah 2mo ago
>Whether or not these girls had phones, or social media, was irrelevant The article explains why that was not irrelevant.
33.
by nyeah 2mo ago
The article explains very clearly what these issues have to do with each other in this particular case.
34.
by nyeah 2mo ago
TFA gives an example where kids are at risk and an old person is misusing a phone. It is clearly not advocating for this scenario to occur more often. Can you show anything else to indicate that the conclusion is "toughen them up"
35.
by nyeah 2mo ago
I disagree, but thanks for making a coherent argument. It's a ray of sunshine.
36.
by nyeah 2mo ago
In TFA, the author says "agency" not "full agency." I also can't find all these other issues (jobs, etc) in TFA. Where are you getting this?
37.
by nyeah 2mo ago
I agree that there are several different issues at work. Can you show an example of how TFA conflates some of them? You may disagree with the author's conclusions, but that doesn't make the article nonsense.
38.
by nyeah 2mo ago
In what sense does Genghis Khan get away with it? He was a monster.
39.
by nyeah 3mo ago
Some folks might consider 500 years "permanent."
40.
by nyeah 3mo ago
Please don't do this.
41.
by nyeah 3mo ago
I see. Ok.
42.
by nyeah 3mo ago
Atari's whole attitude in the early 1980s was "you will buy games that suck."
43.
by nyeah 3mo ago
I guess we should declare victory. You've acknowledged how LLMs actually work.
44.
by nyeah 3mo ago
In fact LLMs are trained to predict the next token in the training set. Of course sometimes a new text input doesn't match the training set, or it matches two or more places in the training set. LLMs use a neural network to interpolat
45.
by nyeah 3mo ago
Balancing parentheses requires semantic understanding? Look, some folks are more impassioned about this stuff than I am. Maybe that's a good thing. But LLMs do in fact just try to predict the next token, using a very big training set.
46.
by nyeah 3mo ago
Sometimes. But bribery is also a crime, so using that word invites comment.
47.
by nyeah 3mo ago
No, they were correct. In fact an LLM stitches together stuff it observed in its training data. That scales up way better than a lot of us expected, but it's still correct. If you train it on lots of working code, then it's usef
48.
by nyeah 3mo ago
Wallhack is locked into the DNA of CS for some reason. The most common defense by far is mass denial. For the great majority of players that seems to be good enough.
49.
by nyeah 3mo ago
What's really thin is the oxide layer on the surface https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anodizing When exposed to air at room temperature, or any other gas containing oxygen, pure aluminium self-passivates by forming a
50.
by nyeah 3mo ago
Lines of code are a business liability. They are future cost.
51.
by nyeah 3mo ago
In my opinion, you shouldn't have posted a false claim.
52.
by nyeah 3mo ago
You claimed: >crypto in general is a big improvment on banks I responded to your claim. If you feel you can defend your claim, go ahead. If your only response is to change the subject, ok. That's your call.
53.
by nyeah 3mo ago
I'll pick one incorrect claim out of many: Public ledger systems have no privacy at all, by design. You can hope nobody knows which wallet is yours, but that's not serious privacy. Today that's not even really hide-it-from-yo
54.
by nyeah 3mo ago
We know that it is much, much worse than the banks.
55.
by nyeah 3mo ago
lol "self plagiarism". Max Planck got an "extra publication." Counting papers is death. Everything connected with it is death. This is Max fucking Planck, who gave us the photon. We're judging him according to toda
56.
by nyeah 3mo ago
>the idea of wave-packet collapse, when a measurement is done, is by itself completely unsound. It sounds crazy if you read about the math first. Which almost everyone does ... now. But in the lab, if you set up a detector array that rep
57.
by nyeah 3mo ago
Maybe George Gilder is available. No PhD but lots of hands-on experience.
58.
by nyeah 3mo ago
I think this is the real issue. Consumers love shiny cool stuff, but they don't like Clippy the paperclip. They like Siri when it helps but they don't like Siri when it impedes them. What a conundrum! Why oh why are consumers rea
59.
by nyeah 3mo ago
They've spent a lot of money on this technology, and what users want is just not that high a priority.
60.
by nyeah 3mo ago
No. It doesn't have to be a bubble at all. It just has to be a cycle of rapid capital equipment build-out that returns to more normal levels in a few years.

More ›