nyeah

17 ms·

301.
by nyeah 1y ago
Commenter says language carries no meaning. Why discuss? (How would you discuss?)
302.
by nyeah 1y ago
That appears to be meaningless. Please explain without using language.
303.
by nyeah 1y ago
[flagged]
304.
by nyeah 1y ago
They're fine. Mostly the butter stuff tastes good. I wouldn't put snail up there with badger or owl.
305.
by nyeah 1y ago
There can't be much meat on a bat anyway.
306.
by nyeah 1y ago
How have so many commenters missed this point?
307.
by nyeah 1y ago
They're serving notice. Data in vendor custody belongs to the vendor, not to the customer. Customers can go to court to prove otherwise.
308.
by nyeah 1y ago
If anybody is reading this, please hit "parent" a few times to see what everybody actually said.
309.
by nyeah 1y ago
It's not necessarily true. But it's pretty likely. It's worth considering as a possibility.
310.
by nyeah 1y ago
Yes. I feel that way very strongly. What contains no substance is a discussion of how we are smarter about knot theory than the knot theorists ... without even connecting to what makes the problem difficult. Maybe you meant to ask something
311.
by nyeah 1y ago
They only had research mathematicians working on the problem. Until now they didn't have HN commenters. So work went very slowly.
312.
by nyeah 1y ago
I think you're saying that "pocket encyclopedia" is one definition of "lossy encyclopedia" that may occur to people (or that may get marketed on purpose). But that's a very poor definition of LLMs. And so the d
313.
by nyeah 1y ago
If anyone actually cares about this thread, please hit "parent" a few times to see what everyone really wrote.
314.
by nyeah 1y ago
I won't repeat anything I've already repeated. That seems to be a waste of time.
315.
by nyeah 1y ago
Nobody is arguing otherwise, including the people interviewed in the article. The claim was that these people didn't pay. That claim turns out to be incorrect.
316.
by nyeah 1y ago
They knew they didn't have guaranteed access. It's in the article.
317.
by nyeah 1y ago
"People who bought houses and chose an off grid life in a water stressed area and did nothing to alleviate the situation, only add consumption." They paid money for the water.
318.
by nyeah 1y ago
They paid the municipality for the water, but they didn't pay the municipality. Got it.
319.
by nyeah 1y ago
10 cents a gallon, it says, and they haul it themselves.
320.
by nyeah 1y ago
Yeah, when baseline efficiency is zero then there's probably room for improvement.
321.
by nyeah 1y ago
Yeah, valid point.
322.
by nyeah 1y ago
But it's easy to build & easy to read about, so "why isn't it everywhere already" still feels like an open question.
323.
by nyeah 1y ago
It means the heat stays near the hot pipes for quite a while.
324.
by nyeah 1y ago
Ok, fair, clearly I misinterpreted what you wrote.
325.
by nyeah 1y ago
Yes, that is the point of the comment.
326.
by nyeah 1y ago
PG pointed this out a while back. He said that AIs were great at generating typical online comments. (NB I don't know which site's comments he might have been referring to.)
327.
by nyeah 1y ago
This sounds appealingly highbrow, but it's not particularly accurate in my experience. I think the critics often get into their own bizarre headspace that nobody else cares about.
328.
by nyeah 1y ago
As a casual user of Rotten Tomatoes, I can't make any sense out of the ratings. They could be random. The 'critic' ratings have no predictive power at all for me. The 'user' ratings have some value but not a whole
329.
by nyeah 1y ago
Yep. It's the ancient "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM" and "pick your battles" ideas. Everyone has always been amazed how powerful those can be. Agreed, often enough these stupid "imperatives" are ba
330.
by nyeah 1y ago
Found it, thanks!

More ›