Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nyc111
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
361.
▲
by
nyc111
4y ago
"Why is it that no one has undertaken the task of cleaning the Augean stables of elementary differential equations? I will hazard an answer: for the same reason why we see so little change anywhere today, whether in society, in politic
362.
▲
by
nyc111
4y ago
"And cells, in turn, are made of molecules and molecules are made of atoms. Dig even deeper and pretty soon you’ll find yourself at the level of electrons and quarks. These are the particles that have traditionally been considered to b
363.
▲
Time is the increase of order, not disorder
(iai.tv)
2 points
by
nyc111
4y ago
|
0 comments
364.
▲
by
nyc111
4y ago
I have a M1 Macbook Pro. I’m sure it’s a great computer but as soon as I look at the screen a few moments my eyes hurt. I can work with my Macbook Air for hours with no problem. I read all the comments here and no one mentions a problem wit
365.
▲
“I propose a toast to evolution” Frances H. Arnold, Nobel Prize in Chemistry
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
nyc111
4y ago
|
0 comments
366.
▲
Scientific Breakthrough: Mickey Mouse was photographed in the wild
(newnotes3.wordpress.com)
1 points
by
nyc111
4y ago
|
0 comments
367.
▲
by
nyc111
4y ago
Why not practice "Just in Time Mathematics"? Start studying Machine Learning and only study the minimum mathematics necessary to understand particular problems. In other words learn by doing. Do we memorize the entire C library be
368.
▲
by
nyc111
4y ago
> So, if you hold the mass fixed and compress an object into a smaller and smaller radius, then the gravitational pull gets stronger. Eventually, it becomes so strong that not even light can escape. You’ve made a black hole. In Newtonian
369.
▲
Stephen J. Crothers on Non-Existence of Black Holes
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
nyc111
4y ago
|
1 comments
370.
▲
by
nyc111
4y ago
Isn't this true for all animals? How does a cat know that he is a cat? He never sees himself in a mirror but somehow knows that he is like other cats. I understand that they observe other cats' behavior, but how does he know initi
371.
▲
by
nyc111
4y ago
Matt Strassler: «The details of the reconstructed image depend on exactly what assumptions are made.» https://profmattstrassler.com/2022/05/12/in-our-galaxys-cent... What does this mean? If they assembled an
372.
▲
by
nyc111
4y ago
> A constant implied that it had identified two proportional quantities — in this case, period squared and distance cubed. In other words, it stopped when it found an equation. Very interesting article. Thanks for posting. I've been
373.
▲
Something for Nothing – Rube Goldberg (1940)
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
nyc111
4y ago
|
0 comments
374.
▲
Earth Goes Around the Sun? What’s Your Best Evidence?
(profmattstrassler.com)
2 points
by
nyc111
4y ago
|
0 comments
375.
▲
Werner Herzog on Philosophy of His Films, Cancel Culture, Consumerism and More
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
nyc111
4y ago
|
0 comments
376.
▲
by
nyc111
4y ago
> Those physicists who said otherwise were either incompetent or lying or both, the rest knew it but kept their mouth shut, and now they hope you’ll forget about this and give them money for a bigger collider. This, coming from a physici
377.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
> I will hold regular 1:1 meetings and create an open-door policy... That's the only best practice he mentions: have weekly one on one meetings.
378.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
> (Unambiguity) Every well-formed expression in the notation should have a unique mathematical interpretation in 𝑋 This is never the case in physics because the equality sign "=" is loaded and can mean equality, definition, pro
379.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
> You’re probably thinking of how a proton has a mass of 938 MeV/c^2. Yes, that’s what I was thinking. But it seems that there is a problem with the definition of the word “mass”. Clearly there are at least two definitions. First, t
380.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
Do we actually know how physicists define "mass" in this context? Because, in physics many words have technical meanings that only physicists can know. For instance, as a layman when I see the word "particle" I imagine a
381.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
> that we call the ruliad—and that our physical laws arise in an inexorable way from the particular samples we take of this structure. What is a physical law? To me a physical law is a proportionality, that is, an equality of ratios. Whe
382.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
> When we do physics, the traditional approach has been to start from our basic sensory experience of the physical world, and of concepts like space, time and motion—and then to try to formalize our descriptions of these things, and buil
383.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
I don't agree with this article, it as off-putting as the usual math eduacation it criticizes. I wonder how one can propose a curriculum to study math and not mention Euclid. One learns more mathematics from this article https:/&
384.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
Thanks for the reference to Dismal Arithmetic, I found it very interesting. By the way, according to Wikipedia, Dismal Arithmetic is now called Lunar Arithmetic. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_arithmetic
385.
▲
Learn Awk with Emacs (2020)
(jherrlin.github.io)
96 points
by
nyc111
5y ago
|
30 comments
386.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
Nice article but who is "you" here? It's very difficult to define who is addicted. In the case of sugar addiction, it is the sugar loving microorganisms that live inside the body. It is not the conscious mind who is addicted.
387.
▲
Cavendish Experiment (1798)
(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points
by
nyc111
5y ago
|
0 comments
388.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
She explains it nicely. She mentions "Quantum Mechanics" several times, physicsts like to talk about these tehories as if they were a single intelligible theory, but they are not, there are as many Quantum Mechanics as there are p
389.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
> For some reason—whether a sense that there was some mistake, or someone copied something down wrong, or because it was so absurd—the manuscripts we have show that Heron ignored the minus sign and gave the answer as √63 instead. I wonde
390.
▲
by
nyc111
5y ago
> Two spheres. Proper motion can be explained completely if we allow each star to exist on its own crystal sphere. Wow! I can believe we are discussing in the age of Hubble space telecope and Webb etc. the existence of crystal spheres an
More ›