numberalltheway

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by numberalltheway 3y ago

   Trying my best to explain computer science topics I'm interested in https://numbersallthewaydown.com/
2. 2.▲
   by numberalltheway 3y ago

   This is a great first step. It's a joke that Open AI thinks they can get away with saying they use "both publicly available data (such as internet data) and data licensed from third-party providers" in their Technical Report.
3. 3.▲
   by numberalltheway 3y ago

   I see what you're saying. I'm pointing this out as especially notable and frustrating because of the success that OpenAI had with GPT-4. To me, there's a world of difference between a random arXiv entry and this.
4. 4.▲
   GPT-4 Technical Report: A blog post masquerading as scientific literature(numbersallthewaydown.com)

   3 points by numberalltheway 3y ago|2 comments
5. 5.▲
   by numberalltheway 4y ago

   It's even more frustrating that, from what I can tell, there is nothing published about how GPT-4 improved. I take specific exception to the hiding of the data and techniques used to generate the model. There must be something specific
6. 6.▲
   by numberalltheway 4y ago

   I'm particularly interested how GPT-4 manages multi-modal processing. Do the images share the same domain as the text inputs, or is there some location in the model inputs that is ~for images only~. The Technical Report states that &qu