nuclearnice1

7 ms·

31.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
I encounter that mode of conversation often. I would say it is the overwhelming majority of people’s approach. They have a point of view and are emotionally committed to it. They have this commitment almost equally across opinions even if
32.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
I’m not personally aware of anyone who uses these reviews at all. That said I am excited about tiny gains and the idea evoked by the chart. The chart from bullshit territory is borrowed from the first chapter James Clear’s book Atomic Habit
33.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
I suspect it’s gpt-speak.
34.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
Here’s a video interview with Nolan from June this year https://youtu.be/2A__XuCDgss
35.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
Brilliant! What’s your tool chain in terms of hardware and libraries and so on look like? I imagine your skill set is very rare in that community.
36.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
This is a nice game. What technology stack did you use to implement?
37.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
What a wonderfully informative and educational comment. Thank you. Would you also be able to shed some light on what a singularity is? It was not intuitive to me that incompressiblity should lead to a singularity. The article dances around
38.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
I agree with the sentiment. From the text I think he draws a distinction between consciously deciding not to do something and missing it entirely. Level 5 allows consciously dropping — saying “I’m sorry [can’t do it] a lot” Level 6 - you
39.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
How did it fall short?
40.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
> The paper does not analyze the transactions directly unless I'm missing that piece. It looks at transactions and attempts to classify coins as scam or not. It doesn’t make any claims about the volume in scam coins. That’s more a c
41.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
You asked how it was misleading. I told you.
42.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
Sargos explained how it’s misleading. > “97% of the tokens are scams so Uniswap is unsafe to use" People are likely to draw the unsafe assumption. Sargos attempted to clarify that some safety is created with filtering via a trusted
43.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
Indeed a very complex question to answer. One of the most interesting parts of the paper is the discussion of the various types of scam — simple rug pull, sell rug pull, smart contract trap door of various flavors. From their paper, I think
44.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
Reminds of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenspun%27s_tenth_rule > Any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Common Lis
45.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
Hey! Fair point but don't be snarky.
46.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
I like your opening question. A casual way to establish some context and rapport. I’m not sure this is a competing take vs the article. More like complementary. The article mainly says “add more details.” Eg. Don’t write “the system is brok
47.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
Haha now at last I love it
48.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
Feel free to share the better phrasing!
49.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
One difference might be the pedagogical vs the productive perspective. Perhaps the magic of a full fledged IDE is thought to obscure some of what is essential to the subject.
50.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
No. You’d find more information on the real person. But the news might be bad.
51.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
The article cites > In a May survey of about 1,200 Americans, 70% of adult Gen Z respondents (ages 18 to 25) and 53% of millennial respondents (up to age 41) said they watch content with text most of the time. That’s compared with slight
52.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
Another excellent paper on the similarities between all those linear models is “ A Unifying Review of Linear Gaussian Models” > Factor analysis, principal component analysis, mixtures of gaussian clusters, vector quantization, Kalman fil
53.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
First sentence: don’t guess people’s motivations Second sentence: explain people’s motivations
54.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
What’s second and third?
55.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
Are stablecoins “widely accepted as a medium of exchange?” I know some places accept Bitcoin. Tesla accepts Dogecoin for some products. What can you buy with stablecoins?
56.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
You’re quite passionate about it. Could you explain some of your reasons?
57.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
That number might be low enough that there is no need to emphasize the probation period to candidates. If 20% of candidates are getting cut after the probation, I’m very hesitant. Losing 5% quickly is only slightly above normal and may, in
58.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
I agree with the other poster. The possibility of ending up unemployed is a bit stressful here. What percentage of people get let go within 90 days?
59.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
In my experience, it’s impossible to assemble a group of 1000 programmers who are consistently able to read a license and reason correctly about whether the firm can follow it.
60.
by nuclearnice1 4y ago
The validators have staked 32 ETH to the network. If they stay up, they get rewards. If they go down, they get hit with penalties. This incentivizes building a reliable system. Is it sufficient? I’m not sure.

More ›