Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nubg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
151.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
> AI insight porn put very succinctly. if done without ai, the more impressive!
152.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Dear author, can you post the prompt? I'm not sure which parts are what you actually meant to write and which are LLM fillings.
153.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
@dang this is an ai slop account, check his other comments
154.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
I don't get the iOS one?
155.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
> understandably why?
156.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
How is Qwen3.5 with 9B anywhere close to GPT-5.4 with xxxB?
157.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
His ignorance is my first-mover opportunity!
158.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
> both will upload your browser history to the cloud I wonder if the EU could fine them a couple weeks of revenue for this. Seems illegal.
159.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
It's irony ofc
160.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
rules of thumb for when to take blog posts about AI coding seriously: - must be using the latest state of the art model from the big US labs - must be on a three digit USD per month plan - must be using the latest version of a full major ha
161.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Would getting to the same edge-case-free outcome have taken you less than 2h20min if you didn't have AI? I think it would typically have taken you longer.
162.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
For me it's simple: 1. Assume you're to work on product/feature X. 2. If God were to descend and give you a very good, reality-tested spec: 3. Would you be done faster? Of course, because as every AI doomer says, writing code
163.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Yes I understand but so far I don't know what such a company could look like, or even in what industry it would be.
164.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
I reject your accusation that they are not substantial. Leave me alone. Edit: lmao at stuff like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47359650 very substantial!
165.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Can you give an example of what a solo founder might now make top dollar on that he previously couldn't?
166.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
> Not because it’s trendy. Because ACID compliance > The CAP theorem is not a suggestion. It’s a mathematical proof. > this is not a philosophical inconvenience. It’s a compliance violation. @dang, i thought we just banned AI writt
167.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
It's the harness giving the LLM contradictory instructions. What you don't see is Claude Code sending to the LLM "Your are done with plan mode, get started with build now" vs the user's "no".
168.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?
169.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
God's work. Page literally jumped away from me with an ad/paywall.
170.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Why did they attempt to pass the closed Strait of Hormuz?
171.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Would you mind sharing the presentation? Or an AI summary of it.
172.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Agreed, but if that came at a cost of 1 trillion dollars of debt and investments, it might be a disappointment again. Note that I am bullish on AI coding in general, just trying to contextualize your statement.
173.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
> mid-2024 agents Is this a post about AI archeology?
174.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Could the author please provide the prompt that was used to vibe write this blog post? The topic is interesting, but I would rather read the original prompt, as I am not sure which parts still match what the author wanted to say, vs flowerl
175.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Exactly, that's why I'm saying, why are you cheering about getting off on a technicality?
176.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
> That said, if you have a job where you create complexity for others, you will be found out. Anybody have examples?
177.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Why not just drive under the speed limit and sober instead of giggling about avoiding penalties while endangering us all? Note that not once did you mention that you were innocent.
178.
▲
by
nubg
7mo ago
Thanks, but it seems down?
179.
▲
by
nubg
8mo ago
thanks a lot
180.
▲
by
nubg
8mo ago
link to the memo?
More ›