nsonha

56 ms·

871.
by nsonha 3y ago
There is clearly a conceptual difference between a set of things from which you pull things out randomly, and a queue. A queue always has intrinsic criteria to select the next item to be pulled out.
872.
by nsonha 3y ago
It's the same in that js is the standard runtime, and typescript is something that compiles to it, that's NOT used in all codebases
873.
by nsonha 3y ago
job should be attempted inthe same order/priority they are enqueued, that's the meaning of the word "queue". That they take varrying amounts of time is another matter.
874.
by nsonha 3y ago
The order matters in the sense that the 5th jobs should not be atempted before those 4.
875.
by nsonha 3y ago
so explain to me again why I have to change my entire toolchain for simply consuming a library? What if I consume a wasm library written in Rust, suddenly I have to add rust into my build script? What is the point of bytecode if people are
876.
by nsonha 3y ago
So consumers are forced to use a bundler/ts just because some random dependency decided they're too lazy to deal with a bundler? > Bundling is purely an application concern by this logic all compiled languages' repos shoul
877.
by nsonha 3y ago
Parallel or not, the order is of importance in any queue system.
878.
by nsonha 3y ago
Ok but where is that Sydney city?
879.
by nsonha 3y ago
Lol why? You are coding definitive rules not heuristics. The odd of the branch getting hit has no bearing here. When the edge cases get bloated, it’s time to make a validator function for your input and leave the main function with happy pa
880.
by nsonha 3y ago
You are right and I was wrong, reinventing the wheel is the least harmful thing of the like of htmlx. The actual dumb thing is that they cling on to a fundamentally wrong abstraction to build apps (form method), simply because that’s the we
881.
by nsonha 3y ago
It's very simple, just put the project up and note: "I make a thing the way I like it". Do not paint a picture of something that you've made for public interests and actively encourage people to use it. Like when you mak
882.
by nsonha 3y ago
I didn’t say anything about supporting, just not to mislead people.
883.
by nsonha 3y ago
I think it's ok, great even, the urge to make something that's so strong that you do act on it. Having said a lot of people do software development for a living and they may depend on your project. So I think OSS authors do have t
884.
by nsonha 3y ago
uncool would be blindly objecting something without even understanding why you do it.
885.
by nsonha 3y ago
Imagine any other consumer product boasting about teaching you things, instead of just do what it means to do. Also am I dumb? Why do I need to be taught these things again and again every damn installation?
886.
by nsonha 3y ago
what is "local water"? The whole thing about water is that it flows. There isn't a magic property that bound water to a geographic localtion. Like when it rains, is it "local" cloud?
887.
by nsonha 3y ago
React has no data binding at all, let alone 2 ways.
888.
by nsonha 3y ago
Lots of roundabout thinking to eventually reinvent observable
889.
by nsonha 3y ago
You seen a 100MB web apps? That's pretty common in mobile apps. A practical restriction rather than a principle one. A web app can be as large as it wants, it will just take forever to load or some obscene over-engineering to stream th
890.
by nsonha 3y ago
to be fair there are a lot of those people who would not shut up about "native" html and "use the platform". Anyone develops for more than one platforms knows that platform is always the first thing to be abstracted away
891.
by nsonha 3y ago
They are saying if they have say an iphone and an android (tablet?), the same app should behave the same. Contrary to you, some people could not care less about "consistency" of different apps that have different UIs and do differ
892.
by nsonha 3y ago
the website mechanism has so many flaws, an abitrary code size restriction for once, constant access to the internet for another. And you can't really tell if the code you run today is the same as that yesterday.
893.
by nsonha 3y ago
the evil is trying to do web dev with whatever back-end language that's convenient to you even though javascript might be better. PHP, JSP, ASP they're all the same kind of mess, just some of them are more verbose than the others.
894.
by nsonha 3y ago
Isn't it obvious, just use what everyone use (golang at the moment)? Is your role as a software engineer NOT a job/creating values for other people, but to "influence technology" or some sort of activism? I know that the
895.
by nsonha 3y ago
no, the LLM is breaking new grounds everyday. FE frameworks are... doing templating in another syntax? Cool!!!
896.
by nsonha 3y ago
A big part of why java sucks is that you get failed software engineers to teach them at universities, and teenages took their crappy code and think that's representative of java or programming as a whole even.
897.
by nsonha 3y ago
Even if they don't they shouldn't be forced to choose between buying yet another computer they rarely use and doing personal things on a laptop where they also do important works.
898.
by nsonha 3y ago
The problem is having too many devices. Most people should just need a phone that can also serve as a personal computer. A personal laptop is a hassle, remember we already have a work computer provided by our employers
899.
by nsonha 3y ago
Do people actually like C#? It seems like a really bloated language with a ton of features.
900.
by nsonha 3y ago
This has been possible in live share since the beginning. I guess now they’ve just made it built-in and a standalone thing.

More ›