nsonha

29 ms·

541.
by nsonha 2y ago
Comparing it with React is a low bar, since a lot of people are unhappy with React. Arguments like "React is popular, AI knows it", or "React is popular, lots of component have been written in it" seem weak. A proper ant
542.
by nsonha 2y ago
Have you actually tried? I have not, but just look at how it still regenerates the entire code instead of producing a diff. Who iterates on software like that?
543.
by nsonha 2y ago
> Adjust your browser window width, or apply a user style sheet very funny, both jokes
544.
by nsonha 2y ago
sorry the format of this site is just too annoying for me to bother to read it. If this is about the shocking revelation that you can paste some code into the browser console, aka manually extracting information, then manually put that into
545.
by nsonha 2y ago
what doesn't? duh
546.
by nsonha 2y ago
> why a shadow root instead of the markup directly, well, that's kinda like asking why use web components at all that's way off. Web component is about encapsulation/reuse of code & markup. I am willing to entertain th
547.
by nsonha 2y ago
I love that you frame it as him still having both the moral and legal high ground, he doesn't
548.
by nsonha 2y ago
sorry I did not know about `shadowrootmode` but your original comment was just a single statement with a very specific claim. Now you are right about that you can use template without js. But I have to ask: what is the point of declarative
549.
by nsonha 2y ago
just do a quick scan in this thread, many say it's the one thing that makes web components not work for them. It's the opposite of what a killer feature means
550.
by nsonha 2y ago
really I feel the same as them
551.
by nsonha 2y ago
that's just wrong
552.
by nsonha 2y ago
that's React's implementation, we are talking what it would be if not React. IMO the semantic is similar to attribute, example: let element = <my-thing my-attribute={value} /> element.property = prop
553.
by nsonha 2y ago
jsx is just a syntax to construct elements with attributes. You can still add properties like you do in a web component. In React you mostly never deal with instances (and properties) but that doesn't mean other ways to model component
554.
by nsonha 2y ago
It's always amazed me that Notion got as popular as it did. It's not exactly user-friendly nor technically cappable (not having API or any kind of external integration for most of its existence). There seems to be a group of nerds
555.
by nsonha 2y ago
is this a Rails thing? Is there a server component?
556.
by nsonha 2y ago
Accept it, it is the deal with opensource. It's also the basis that people should be using when debating OSS versus other models. People should not be making business or policies or economic decisions based on some unenforceable honor
557.
by nsonha 2y ago
Such as web3/cypto/bullshit
558.
by nsonha 2y ago
any way to access your project dependencies and source files? Similar to how in python you can create a kernel from a .venv?
559.
by nsonha 2y ago
The US military spends a lot of cash funding Hollywood blockbusters for the exact reason. However when it comes to things that actually benefits society like science, they don't even have enough funding to just do the thing, let alone
560.
by nsonha 2y ago
a tweet of unsubstantial claims, how impressive and thought provoking /s
561.
by nsonha 2y ago
Because of the dogma of semantic web
562.
by nsonha 2y ago
idk, don't you find jailing people for crimes they have not committed (but likely to I guess) a bit... insane?
563.
by nsonha 2y ago
But the wording makes it like it's about revisions.
564.
by nsonha 2y ago
PHP has all the same problems (composer or whatever), plus being a shit language that NOBODY uses for scripting.
565.
by nsonha 2y ago
the whole idea of firebase is flawed as logic that belongs to a server is now on the client side. I don't know much about security but that sounds like making any centralized rule (eg security) hard to implement. It also tends to expos
566.
by nsonha 2y ago
Stop spamming the thread with petty tool people don't actually need.
567.
by nsonha 2y ago
why do you need a "command runner"? Have you heard of bash functions? Or... make? The thing is too simple to justify installing another tool, however nifty it is.
568.
by nsonha 2y ago
If anything that's the opposite of the point GP was making (low barrier to entry)
569.
by nsonha 2y ago
that's nonsense Ruby, Python and JS are all at about the same level of difficulty, most of the semantic is the same. If anything, the messiness of the language and ecosystem is the higher barrier of entry (Python and JS). JS is popular
570.
by nsonha 2y ago
nothing ever dies, but that doesn't say anything useful for most of us, building system that is practical today and continue to be PRACTICALLY maintainable for about 50 years.

More ›