nsonha

31 ms·

571.
by nsonha 2y ago
Like you dont have to know native components anyway? In one way you centralise as much logic as you can and are encouraged to write clean code that doen't depend on platfrom quirks. In the other way you... give up and just do whatever.
572.
by nsonha 2y ago
Is there anything like this with vector an multimodal search as well? I know I'm asking too much.
573.
by nsonha 2y ago
> window tiling shortcut requires dragging a window first man that's so dumb
574.
by nsonha 2y ago
is that Apple's job, to make client app for X?
575.
by nsonha 2y ago
no, a slot has only 1 IMEI. Even with actual e-sim you can only activate 1 at a time even though you can have more than one.
576.
by nsonha 2y ago
did the author forget the age of mobile phones? You need an API anyway.
577.
by nsonha 2y ago
the answer is simple, they don't care that much about privacy, despite claiming so. And for the rest of us devs who actually care, we're just lazy and continue using the work browser for private purposes. Why Chrome as work browse
578.
by nsonha 2y ago
Which is just an `npm install` away: https://npmjs.com/package/flux-capacitor
579.
by nsonha 2y ago
If you wanna put people into boxes, I am northern Vietnamese - Australian
580.
by nsonha 2y ago
I think I can, this is the part of the world where I know the history & culture. I understand the nuances in the feud I am supposed to have with the Chinese. What do you know? Do you even live here or speak any of the languages?
581.
by nsonha 2y ago
I am Vietnamese. Of course I cannot speak for everyone, but I think, in general, I can call westerners simpleton in this matter.
582.
by nsonha 2y ago
They should fuck off to their part of the world. I am not Chinese but everyone in this region has gotten enough of you idiots fucking us up over colonialism dont you think? China has no incentive to disrupt the status quo, they have already
583.
by nsonha 2y ago
War with China is far, far from a reality, I really doubt anyone's intelligence if they claim so, maybe read less of your government's propaganda.
584.
by nsonha 2y ago
> offers routing and jsx rendering out of the box It gives you building blocks to hack together your own router and SSR. Not the same as offering things "out of the box". You talk about framework deprecation while using non sta
585.
by nsonha 2y ago
> most code on the backend, a saner and more stable place for code to live sorry a very flawed opinion, code should live where it runs. Code that runs on server should live on back-end. Code that runs on browser should live on the front-
586.
by nsonha 2y ago
I should not have to explain this, but that just runs typescript. It doesn't even render tsx (you have to write the code to call renderToString or whatever), it also does not create the minimal html scaffolding behind the scence that n
587.
by nsonha 2y ago
the point is that Next can bootstrap an app with only 2 files (your entry point and package.json) as I mentioned. Of course you can write code on top of bun to turn it into a mini web framework but it is nowhere as lean as the Nextjs minima
588.
by nsonha 2y ago
Bun is not a front-end framework. It can bundle, but it doesn't serve the bundle or split it by pages, so that's not a fair comparison.
589.
by nsonha 2y ago
nothing can beat the simplicity of Nextjs using the old page router. Try it, all you need for a starting point is a package.json (react, react-dom and next as dependencies), and a pages directory with a single index.tsx, no need to even ins
590.
by nsonha 2y ago
This is not the same but reminds me that every piece of writing deserves annotations and discussion. I don't care much for the "live" part. I wish there was some social network built around that idea, kinda like reddit and tw
591.
by nsonha 2y ago
> works damn fine when? View code in the back-end always looks like crap and never able to achieve the interactivity the front-end can. People wrestling with it was the reason SPA was born. There was no dictator forcing people to move on
592.
by nsonha 2y ago
htmlx, taiwind and the like certainly help back-end dev churn out web codebases faster, eliminating a lot of poor souls who have to maintain them afterward!
593.
by nsonha 2y ago
clear boundary is good, I don't understand why people like to trash their back-end with templates, MVC and all the "view" nonsense. They are just shifting complexity from a place they feel uncomfortable, to where they do, but
594.
by nsonha 2y ago
Why do we avoid build tools again? Webdevs comes up with the most arbitrary goals, I swear to God. Do you not run a script to deploy your software in whatever way? If you do then what's the difference if the script builds some things a
595.
by nsonha 2y ago
can we get all these "pure web" people to put their content on RSS or some sort of "pure information hub" like wikipedia? HTML clearly is not the medium for this anymore, have you seen how bloated and NOT content-centric
596.
by nsonha 2y ago
that sounds like a made up story
597.
by nsonha 2y ago
Is this similar to React Server Actions?
598.
by nsonha 2y ago
> array-like API why is this arbitrary property desirable?
599.
by nsonha 2y ago
I used to think Bret Victor's work is cool but how exactly do we build all these seemingly ad-hoc interactions into systems? one-by-one? Maybe generative code AI can do it on-demand one day?
600.
by nsonha 2y ago
styled-components is css, don't lump it together with tailwind

More ›