nsajko

72 ms·

811.
by nsajko 6y ago
> US Libertarians: limit the size and scope of government What I was aiming at with GP post was that as far as I understand, at least in the early days of the Libertarian Party, a significant number of them were actually completely again
812.
by nsajko 6y ago
It's Peter Troyer's story, the first one. It does not mention Arthur Clarke's name, but: > I grew up in Sri Lanka. > Our parents mostly let us do what we wanted, but we were told to stay away—never go near—a large prope
813.
by nsajko 6y ago
Surprised there is no mention of Doug McIlroy: https://wiki.c2.com/?DougMcIlroy
814.
by nsajko 6y ago
It's a meme: https://www.reddit.com/r/copypasta/comments/5we0ny/if_youre_...
815.
by nsajko 6y ago
Not sure that "weapon of mass destruction" is itself a useful term, but you are wrong because an army (composed of people) is not a weapon.
816.
by nsajko 6y ago
The same research was discussed two days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23387374
817.
by nsajko 6y ago
> I love some of Arthur Clarke’s works and ideas. He was also a pedo guy I think with such an accusation you are bound to tell more about what you know. For what its worth I found this: https://www.vice.com/en_ca/art
818.
by nsajko 6y ago
The distinctions between 'socialist', 'anarchist', 'communist', 'libertarian', and then 'objectivist' (Randian) and probably others are too blurry when considering it across time and geograp
819.
by nsajko 6y ago
What makes the predatory journals relatively non-serious? What merit is there in your distinction between a "hoaxed" journal and a journal that publishes faulty papers on purpose? Please see the "Bogdanov affair", where
820.
by nsajko 6y ago
Some quick notes: * You seem to conflate citation rings with self-citation and confuse the latter with self-referentialism. It is interesting to think in what way could your comment thus be considered topical... * Citation rings are, indeed
821.
by nsajko 6y ago
Still not clear what is being discussed as "self-referential". No offence, but maybe you are confused between self- referential and self- centered ?
822.
by nsajko 6y ago
Off topic, but > self-referential post-modernist bullshit Umm, what? What contaminations exactly are you thinking about? I just can't place self-referentiality into this topic. Are you suggesting there is a comparable analysis that
823.
International Photography Awards one-shot “MOVEMENT” competition winners(photoawards.com)
1 points by nsajko 6y ago|0 comments
824.
by nsajko 6y ago
The Ghidra and R2 used in for the article are now a year old. Is that just because of the journal delay? Here are the radare2 and Ghidra reports: https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra/issues/657 h
825.
by nsajko 6y ago
Any idea why the git repo does not contain the data?
826.
by nsajko 6y ago
Mirrored on another author's site: https://www.muhui.site/publication/issta_2020
827.
by nsajko 6y ago
Counterpoint: the POTUS has plenty of opportunity to get his voice heard independently of Twitter and Twitter has a right as to what they will publish. I agree that public officials' correspondence should be archived and publicly avail
828.
by nsajko 6y ago
A glaring ommision in the article is how it fails to mention that King was himself of socialist and anti-war persuasion.
829.
by nsajko 6y ago
The Copyright Office "forgot" about the public interest. Basically, they represent the copyright owners. The best part is how they second guess courts. Try at least skimming the article, though.
830.
by nsajko 6y ago
In December 2019, the Register of Copyrights (Karyn Temple) announced leaving the Copyright Office to join the Motion Picture Association , effective January 3, 2020. https://www.copyright.gov/newsnet/2019/791.htm
831.
by nsajko 6y ago
The Byrne they mention is Oliver Byrne, who made a book of Elements of Euclid including colored graphics for the geometry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Byrne_(mathematician) Archive.org, print: https:/&
832.
by nsajko 6y ago
Not sure if this is what you want, but it's a short read anyway; search for Second Sources : * http://www.ganssle.com/tem/tem288.html * http://www.ganssle.com/tem/tem289.html
833.
by nsajko 6y ago
I mean, I (and most people on this thread...) agree with you, I believe it is almost always "nicer" to be consistent and have minimal ISRs. But her/his point (as I interpret it, at least) was that in some situations a somewha
834.
by nsajko 6y ago
I assume the command processing was simply not a predictably small enough of a workload to fit into the time budget for an ISR. Besides, that is irrelevant for his point, he already gave an example of a "big" ISR, it doesn't
835.
by nsajko 6y ago
Actually, she/he moved the code for acknowledging radio packets into the ISR , relative to the the "by the book" solution of having minimal ISRs.
836.
by nsajko 6y ago
One of the things from the list that could be improved is this: > Algorithmic optimizations have a greater impact than micro optimizations This is kind of tautological, as micro optimizations can be an important part of algo optimization
837.
by nsajko 6y ago
> I feel like half of what's here points to using rust or a rust like language as a good thing. Which points exactly? Also, neither the Rust standard library, nor the C++ std::shared_ptr were designed with embedded in mind. Also, Ru
838.
by nsajko 6y ago
> I disagree. If you have interrupt priorities then you can treat your interrupt service routines as the highest priority tasks. ... I think "Keep ISRs small" is still a good guideline for most cases. Big interrupt handlers req
839.
by nsajko 6y ago
The Facebook issue seems to be that Trump (and other politicians world-wide?) are getting special treatment from moderation. I think that Trump's "When the looting starts, the shooting starts" comment is not incitement to vio
840.
Embedded Rules of Thumb (2018)(embeddedartistry.com)
168 points by nsajko 6y ago|60 comments

More ›