Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nrmitchi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
nrmitchi
4mo ago
I just _know_ there is a (probably fairly large) group of people at Anthropic trying very hard to not say "I told you so" today
62.
▲
by
nrmitchi
4mo ago
> Builds change overnight, new versions every month with small updates. Small updates are in no way throwing away the entire thing. A monthly update is not a start-from-scratch redevelopment. The old version was not disposed of in the wa
63.
▲
by
nrmitchi
4mo ago
> Craftsmanship will always be in our hands, it's one thing we can never outsource to a machine. I'm right there with you, but this last sentence concerned me a bit. In my most other "industries", craftsmanship is not
64.
▲
by
nrmitchi
4mo ago
It’s a supply and demand thing. Google would definitely be buying from nvidia and setting up themselves if nvidia had the capacity. SpaceX/xAi/musk are currently in a good market for “happening to own 100k cards we have nothing to
65.
▲
by
nrmitchi
4mo ago
IIRC the large majority of their hardware (at least one tranche, they might have gotten more later) was Elon effectively stealing it from Tesla for xAI, saying “I’m personally doing Tesla a favor, since they can’t fully utilize it currently
66.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
> doctrine of consular nonreviewability protects any denial from judicial review, and there is no administrative appeals process. I personally think this is the big secondary benefit that the administration is going for.
67.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
The literal next line after your quote is: > While aliens who were inspected and admitted or paroled may request adjustment of status, as a general matter the discretionary approval of such a request is extraordinary given Congress’s int
68.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
It is absolutely NOT specific to the very limited situation you are describing, which is already a big red flag when processing applications.
69.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
There is no carve out in this memo that says it’s only for B1/B2. Or that K-1 is excluded. An entire visa class is not “obviously an exception”, or it would be clear.
70.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
These are great improvements, it's good to see Apple investing in improvements like this (especially with the Vision Pro) but I can't help but feel that they utility will remain very low until they make the Vision Pro look signifi
71.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
I completely agree with the outlook, but from a practical standpoint (in the last couple of years) I have seen the opposite. The SOC2 process is often transformative ("should" vs "is" are not the same thing). Especially
72.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
This whole story is just line after line of utter incompetence. The "after they were fired" sounds catchy, but isn't even the biggest failure. This organization shouldn't be permitted anywhere near government, or any non
73.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
Yes, that is clear. But in this particular instance the tanstack packages are downstream of a ton of other packages. Tanstack infected a bunch of other packages; then resolving their issue doesn’t fix the widespread issue
74.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
Appreciate the tanstack postmortem, however the security issue as far as the rest of the npm ecosystem goes is still an ongoing concern, correct? Is there evidence that any downstream packages that may have pulled/included tanstack pac
75.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
Yes.
76.
▲
by
nrmitchi
5mo ago
> - AIs can code them up quickly. It used to be a total pain As far my opinion goes, this is biggest (and really only) reason.
77.
▲
by
nrmitchi
6mo ago
This actually seems rather generous of them? Not only are they offering credits equal the cost you paid, but they're offering refunds if you disagree. Anthropic not allowing Claiude Code subscriptions to be used with other projects isn
78.
▲
by
nrmitchi
9mo ago
This has some real "Scott's Tots" energy to it.
79.
▲
by
nrmitchi
10mo ago
> Participants are hired as federal employees based on their technical qualifications and serve in non-partisan roles focused on technology implementation. "non-partisan" lol okay sure
80.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
Im saying that Nvidia’s current monopoly isn’t going to last forever. The product space will (very likely) still exist, but in 10 years Nvidia may not be able to get the ~80% margins it currently does (due to competition, technological chan
81.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
You’re definitely right, but I don’t think the risk here is that the industry goes away, or that there isn’t demand for the same set of products. What I think is likely to go away is Nvidia’s monopoly in the space. When it does, Nvidia will
82.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
Nvidia seems to be operating more like a sovereign wealth fund than a traditional business. They have a very-in-demand product, that is not likely to last forever, and is getting their fingers in as many pies as possible with the money and
83.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
I was not aware that she had made this statement as well. All previous reporting from this morning seemed to report back to a Business Insider article that cited only an "unamed White House official who has been granted anonymity to sp
84.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
That's the thing; the order was not unclear. It very clear said what it said. The general public's opinion that it was grossly unjustified and most likely going to be rolled back does not change how clear the initial order was
85.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
A "White House Official" may be saying this now, but it is not what was in the EO that was actually signed. There were no exclusions for current holders, and the start date was explicitly September 21, 2025 (a date that does app
86.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
This is not true at all. Employers will still sponsor talent that they need. If you are sponsoring an employee for a visa and "it's a great thing they can't quit, it's the main thing that's keeping them here!",
87.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
It would still be required for the content producer (ie, the content-spam-farm) to label their content as such. The current approach is that the content served is the same for humans and agents (ie, a site serves consistent content regardle
88.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
This seems like a (potential) solution looking for a nail-shaped problem. Yes, there is a huge problem with AI content flooding the field, and being able to identify/exclude it would be nice (for a variety of purposes) However, the iss
89.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
My mental model is looking at all of these situations as pre-emptive aquihires. Meta can make 40 of these hires (over a number of years) and still be in a better place than feeling like they have to make a single $10B acquisition (if they c
90.
▲
by
nrmitchi
1y ago
Most non-tech people do not just use cloud services for their data. Really not sure where you got that from, but even if it was true, most non-tech people will still shy away from putting a 250G file in a cloud service once they get promp
More ›