noxer

99 ms·

961.
by noxer 6y ago
>There's no reason the meat industry couldn't.... >But that would be inefficient by market measures. >No reason >Gives reason
962.
by noxer 6y ago
People want it to be but facts are not up for a debate.
963.
by noxer 6y ago
Its not just with evidence its more broadly that many people think the majority has to be right. Which gets worse when the majority actually assumes that. Its then enough to just assume that a majority opinion exists to actually create one.
964.
by noxer 6y ago
Imagine if these people would investigate voter fraud. No mainstream media would ever report that ;P
965.
by noxer 6y ago
I would sympathize with the underdog too. Thats not the problem. The problem is that we collectively support "the wrong" way to resolve such problems. Wrong as in it doesn't solve anything but a specific incident. We know not
966.
by noxer 6y ago
Doesn't really matter and there is no way to know if the HN poster is the affected person or not. What we know is that it creates an incentive for affected people to post future problems like that here if we keep giving these posts att
967.
by noxer 6y ago
Totally outdated and overall pretty useless. Objective in the sense it proclaims to be is not possible. Almost all of the points are completely irrelevant for the average potential user.
968.
by noxer 6y ago
On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. (Who find something interesting that posted here every other week?) Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports (This one goes under politics potential under crime
969.
by noxer 6y ago
>because it's the job of journos to determine the truth You got that wrong, that absolutely not their job.
970.
by noxer 6y ago
Well, they are not ATM. Thats the reality.
971.
by noxer 6y ago
Maybe dont look into the obsolete tech? BTC isnt going anywhere in case of utility. Thats why the Maxis moved from p2p cash to store of value in just a few years. Also the speculation part is kinda needed its the only way something can have
972.
by noxer 6y ago
The rules are not the problem. People agree or go somewhere else. Its how they are applied. Having hacked material not allowed would be totally fine but you cant allow it once and then block it another time. Either is against the rules or n
973.
by noxer 6y ago
Twitter isn't a publisher that is the difference to "media". They are held to a different standard because they claim to not publish just host stuff. You cant exercise editorial control as a hostler. Thats like if a library w
974.
by noxer 6y ago
He didn't say that such a person is or should be elected. Its just rhetoric, no need to imply something into it that he never said. Hes obviously aware that the first amendment can not be overruled by anyone elected or not.
975.
by noxer 6y ago
He describes what he thinks, is what they did and why. Nothing about that is about him. In this quote it doesn't even matter whos article they didn't wanna publish. The whole quoted part could almost identically be written about s
976.
by noxer 6y ago
Correct.. BUT whoever bring up the nazis first loses the argument sorry ;)
977.
by noxer 6y ago
I would go as far as say its a blatant lie. Nothing he wrote puts him in the victim position at all. He is very aware that he doesn't need them to publish his stuff.
978.
by noxer 6y ago
I first only saw part of the title until the word "think" and it made perfect sense to me without the rest.
979.
Beyond Proof of Work: The XRPL Consensus Solution(ripple.com)
1 points by noxer 6y ago|0 comments
980.
by noxer 6y ago
I didn't meant to say that this is a legit reason to use a DL instead of Github/a database. I just wanted to point out the difference. It may or may not matter in this case because the thread is very limited. There are still very
981.
by noxer 6y ago
The part about scalability is very outdated. And comparing it to a centralized database is useless anyway. You would need to compare it to global net of nodes which all sync with one master database. Due to the time it need to sync you simp
982.
by noxer 6y ago
That would be awesome. It could even be setup with a cluster of hosters in different locations.
983.
by noxer 6y ago
Take down chrome then its "intended to circumvent copyright protection measures" as you can clearly watch these youtube videos with chrome.
984.
by noxer 6y ago
If you ignore the fact that people at GitHub can delete whatever they want. The difference is that they probably wont tamper with someones data but they can. On a distributed ledger however "they" are many different humans who don
985.
by noxer 6y ago
There is no such thing as a "write only DB" Who ever has control over that DB physically can tamper it. From external such a DB would be a black box. You store something and read again to check if it has been stored but whoever is
986.
by noxer 6y ago
This wasn't meant to be a scientific publishing so no I'm not gonna back this up with any source. Do your own research or simply skip the part of my comment if you think its wrong. And to all the people commenting below. It doesn&
987.
by noxer 6y ago
You completely make up BS. The whole "death by police hands" is a made up non existing threat to law abiding citizen. And the whole LGBTASDFQWERTY once was about equal rights. Equal rights means you show up at work and do your job
988.
by noxer 6y ago
"Emissions-free" is a lie anyway. Tire rubber dust/oil/windshield wiper fluid etc. There is no such thing as an emission-free car. Also gray energy emission (embodied energy) is completely ignore as allays. If we compare
989.
by noxer 6y ago
But other EVs also improve in that time so kinda irrelevant. And just by the look of it it aerodynamically simply cant compete with a car and no one should expect that.
990.
by noxer 6y ago
You exactly misunderstood it. Personal these topics may be relevant but for the groups mission they are not. It doesn't matter if the topic is relevant for a majority or minority at all. Even if the topic would be of interest for all p

More ›