noxer

101 ms·

931.
by noxer 6y ago
The deleted tweets could be considered "a lie" or whatever but srsly nothing in there justifies deleting it. He's actively calling for peace, law & order and to let the blue do their job. The problem with censorship is th
932.
by noxer 6y ago
Are you incapable of grasping the concept of me just assuring someone is right to ask a followup question? It's not relevant to determine if it is a security but if it is one it still must be of something and since you think it should
933.
by noxer 6y ago
No you did not. You said it should be a security first and I asked you "of what" not "why". The Howey test and all your other argument are not news to me and dont answer the question. What is XRP the security of? And wha
934.
by noxer 6y ago
You dodged the question. A security of what? And yes they do that that right IF there is a security of some sort being sold OR IF there is a contract that implies some sort of security like benefits OF IF there is fraudulent promises being
935.
by noxer 6y ago
A security of what? Just because it does hurt people doesn't make it inherently bad. If you could avoid being hurt maybe other can too and thous who did get hurt anyway took the risk on purpose. Noting wrong with that. The SEC should p
936.
by noxer 6y ago
That's wrong. Read it again especially the last part "Nowhere does the bank need someone else's money to give you that credit." They cant credit infinite amount because there is no infinite no-risk demand for credit. Ban
937.
by noxer 6y ago
Why? Does it hurt you? Its all just a huge tech experiment just like the internet was. We have no clue where it leads to but I want to see it in 10 or 20 years.
938.
by noxer 6y ago
Ofc the central bank is in control that's the whole point of the central bank. But the central bank does not single-handedly control the money supply it controls the value to other currencies by buying/selling stuff to maintain a
939.
by noxer 6y ago
Same should apply to XRP then because it exist way longer than ETH. But unlike ETH, XRP was never sold in return for and arbitrary amount of BTC/USD it was first given away for free and later sold at market value.
940.
by noxer 6y ago
>XRP is centralized Useless statement XRP is the token there is no definition what makes the token centralized or not. Half the tokens owned by one party? or maybe a quarter is enough already? Its a useless statement as there is no commo
941.
by noxer 6y ago
Demand. Just that. And no, its obviously not pegged to the USD or to anything. Price is a direct result of supply and demand. It has value because people pay for it.
942.
by noxer 6y ago
they dont want your deposit. its useless to them. that's why you have to pay for bank services nowadays.
943.
by noxer 6y ago
>"commercial banks invest my money on my behalf without me having any control over the process" This is completely wrong. Your money on your bank account doesn't exist. What you see is the number of dollars the bank owes y
944.
by noxer 6y ago
The author of this articles apparently thinks the money supply is increased by the central banks. This is not correct. Banks are the real money printers. Central banks may issue cash but banks can issue credit based on someone else's d
945.
by noxer 6y ago
welfare is kinda a broad description for a lot of ideas but in general I would say if someone has extreme views on this is most probably due to a lack of understanding the effect it has. I cant imagine that someone who would serious dig int
946.
by noxer 6y ago
Ever thought about that its simply not true? He wants help to get a significant amount of money back. People do everything in such a situation including making up a story that gets the maximum attention. Maybe it really was all his savings
947.
by noxer 6y ago
Its not but it still relies on endless exponential growth which is not possible. The cycles are 4 year so it may work for a long time.
948.
by noxer 6y ago
It actually means no ATH was reached. We just reached a higher number in dollar value. The actual goods you can buy with one bitcoin is still lower than at the peak in 2017. Obvious measuring form peak to peak is rather meaningless.
949.
by noxer 6y ago
Maybe point a strong laser at the cam instead so its "blinded" and all pixels have max brightness. Or even destroy the sensor with a laser, that way it may permanently produce non-random data.
950.
Ask HN: Bypass YouTube age-restricttion without login?
1 points by noxer 6y ago|0 comments
951.
by noxer 6y ago
There are rumors that she did not open the door for a long time and hang up on them when they called. Obviously we dont know if that is true but if it is the cops had to assume well prepared people inside the house. It would be gross neglig
952.
by noxer 6y ago
Also quantum something just in case
953.
by noxer 6y ago
Thats simply nonsense the only way fees could ever pay for it would be if transaction become extremely expensive. You can calculate yourself how much a Tx would have to cost if it should replace the current block reward. 6.25 BTC every 10 m
954.
by noxer 6y ago
It can not stabilize the block reward pays for the mining the fees are almost irrelevant. block reward halves every 4 year so the price has to double at least every 4 year. if it does not it will become lucrative to do double spends at some
955.
by noxer 6y ago
You can do that with Rainmeter
956.
by noxer 6y ago
Did you read the answer above? You obvious didn't. Also why ask me when life begins and then immediately answer it yourself. Beginnings and ends are points in time not arbitrary time spans. These are the facts.
957.
by noxer 6y ago
I've used triggers to extract json data on insert. quite flexible and allows to store the whole JSON without overhead of inserting data twice.
958.
by noxer 6y ago
Link goes to a google docs login page. No wonder they failed^^
959.
by noxer 6y ago
See answer above. There is no need to argue about facts. Words have meanings and they are not debatable. "Living", "death", "to kill" are rather simple words there is really no place for confusion about what th
960.
by noxer 6y ago
I didn't even made an argument. "To kill" means somehow causing the death of something. This the fact. It doesn't matter if its a animal or a human. An certainly doesn't matter where it happens. You can kill somethi

More ›