noxer

53 ms·

511.
by noxer 5y ago
Ofc it will run on it. The specs are especially for CPUs are for manufacturer and never list discontinued CPUs. If you look at the same specs for win 10 you would assume it needs modem hardware but it does not it runs on 10 year old laptop.
512.
by noxer 5y ago
This blog is 8 days old how is this relevant now? Also you can "deploy" window 11 on any SSD as windows2go and boot from it directly if you just want to test it out on real hardware. All checks are skipped this way and you can put
513.
by noxer 5y ago
Crashed with no message within the first 30 seconds clicking around on the UI (windows build) I'll try again in a year or so if it still exists.
514.
by noxer 5y ago
And a NAS is not a replacement for a backup.
515.
by noxer 5y ago
Satellites definitely do watch the whole populated word 24/7. The question is if the satellites that watched this specific place have enough high resolution. And also if some human will ever watch it. Seems like its cloudy and there is
516.
by noxer 5y ago
Most of HN down votes anything about bitcoin and a few HN bitcoin fans down vote anything "negative" about bitcoin and certainly everything involving XRP. So to no surprise this is being down voted. >No BTC involvement required
517.
by noxer 5y ago
No one questions that the people who are bullish on BTC are in on it (some). The question is why would I pay you to lend me BTC when I actually want to send my BTC to someone. It literally adds a third party in what should be a p2p transact
518.
by noxer 5y ago
I did not hand wave anything away, maybe read the thread. There was a wrong generalization (cryptocurrencies == bitcoin) about cryptocurrencies that is very common but not accurate at all. Fair criticism on the Ford Model T does not apply t
519.
by noxer 5y ago
However, answering a rhetorical question is in fact useless.
520.
by noxer 5y ago
You can stop now dear green name we all can see you only joined to shill ButtcoinShitVison No one here cares.
521.
by noxer 5y ago
faceplam FBA is a technology its not a thing or a running system. It can not be centralized its just bunch of math that BTW is mathematically proven to work. There are many FBA based "blockchains" out there some centralized some
522.
by noxer 5y ago
Why ask that useless question?
523.
by noxer 5y ago
There is no bitcoin needed for this at all its does not even move on the chain for the transfer. Both sides are Strike entities all this does is use bitcoin as a bridge for USD to USD which is completely pointless as both sides are USD. You
524.
by noxer 5y ago
You completely ignore my points so I will yours Have a nice day
525.
by noxer 5y ago
The looking up of liquidity is the whole reason LN can not scale or be cheap ever. Today people in crypto may be willing to look up bitcoins they hold long term anyway. But in the real world this would be dead and trapped capital it doesn&#
526.
by noxer 5y ago
It has been "done better" in 2013 or so when the first FBA system where created as an direct answer to bitcoins expected future environmental impact and scalability problems. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?i
527.
by noxer 5y ago
Solves as in it does not use more energy than what the hardware needs to process the data + it doubles every time you double the number of nodes (obviously since they all have to do the same work too) Its not wasting energy for a PoW lotter
528.
by noxer 5y ago
Bitcoins scaling problem was solved by removing PoW/PoS and by removing the incentive structure (block rewards). As soon as this is gone there was no reason anymore why it would not scale like similar systems. Its basically limited onl
529.
by noxer 5y ago
Its centralized and run by the people around this fraud. It doesn't matter if the tech is good since no one will use it for anything beside speculation or abuse it as storage which just wont be sustainable in the long run with no limit
530.
by noxer 5y ago
Everyone knows faketoshi is a fraud.
531.
by noxer 5y ago
It should be p2p cash then turn into store of value after some years and then it becomes the settlement layer for centralized second layer solutions that only exist because the first layer sucks. Just kidding, it should only be p2p cash and
532.
by noxer 5y ago
Daily reminder that cryptocurrencies are not == bitcoin All the problems with bitcoin are long long solved just not with bitcoin because its not possible to fix something when the majority (of hashpower) thinks its not broken or rather prof
533.
by noxer 5y ago
Who cares, the size could be 10 times smaller and it would not make a dent in the scalability problem. Its a few transaction per second at max and it would need to be be several hundred just so people could move their "owned" bitc
534.
by noxer 5y ago
Taproot doesn't make bitcoin scale its mainly to increase privacy.
535.
by noxer 5y ago
0.00090000 BTC moved 0.00005000 BTC Fees Thats 5.55% On the test net! On the real net it would be like 20% or more in fees.
536.
by noxer 5y ago
"...Bitcoin is a living, breathing, developing code base that is moving forward with new features to continue to scale..." There is exactly zero progress to make it scale in the last 10+ years.
537.
by noxer 5y ago
The title is very nonsensical it almost seem to suggestion that "feeling pain" is the reason to protect some living things over others.
538.
by noxer 5y ago
obligatory mention of fossil-scm.org just in case someone don't know yet and would like a version control system++ that actually works for/with you.
539.
by noxer 5y ago
If you kill dwm.exe (Desktop Window Manager) or if it crashes in widows 10 you can see the old UI on all windows that are open for maybe a second or so before dwm.exe comes back. (obviously not recommendation on "production" machi
540.
by noxer 5y ago
It doesn't matter. Revenue is always maximized, this is not a non-profit event, they absolutely dont care about how they could come out breakeven. Also there is essentially no competition. If you want to watch that kind of sport you ca

More ›