notsoanonynous

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by notsoanonynous 5y ago

   Maybe I already did this and maybe I didn’t. Maybe it’s all armchair theorizing. Then again… https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wUJccK4lV74 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SYZqC7EGMfM To not share how you secure a
2. 2.▲
   by notsoanonynous 5y ago

   So what if they find that you used a phone? They still had to somehow link your online identity to your phone. And how would they do that? The phone is simply a computer that you use, through VPNs, to send and reveive mail and post messages
3. 3.▲
   by notsoanonynous 5y ago

   And what would they find? The hardest investigation to defend against is the rubber hose investigation. Gotta give them what they want, without them even suspecting you could be that mysterious founder. The only way people suspect you’re so
4. 4.▲
   by notsoanonynous 5y ago

   I thought it was obvious, but I guess not. No, you don’t do work for money. You start an open source project and get many people to run your software. You meanwhile generate as many early rewards as you can (you can even do it under multi
5. 5.▲
   by notsoanonynous 5y ago

   I am open to ideas for how to mitigate this remaining vulnerability even further
6. 6.▲
   by notsoanonynous 5y ago

   Buy on Craigslist. Go to a store. Or, as mentioned previously, pay a homeless guy to go into the store and buy it. It’s a modular system. The key is Kerchkoff’s principle — I can describe it to you all day long, but as long as I don’t reve
7. 7.▲
   by notsoanonynous 5y ago

   Tor is amateur hour. The Feds can easily deanomymize things where a server is up 24/7 servicing requests. The author of this article is also very wrong: Anonymity is not on a spectrum. It’s all or nothing. Like a Mario game where any m