notch898a

47 ms·

1. 541.▲
   by notch898a 4y ago

   False equivalence. The no-fly is about boarding the airplane at all, not operating it. And AFAIK there are only the narrowest of methods of preventing someone from riding in a vehicle, almost assuredly associated with criminal proceedings
2. 542.▲
   by notch898a 4y ago

   I'm no lawyer but is this even a criminal conspiracy? I thought the 1A covered third party distribution of most stolen secret government information. The media does it and profits and apparently legally.
3. 543.▲
   by notch898a 4y ago

   What's the basis for arresting someone for just being on a watch list? That sounds unconstitutional. I was added to a watch list long ago that results in me being tossed in a cell and "detained" for up to 24 hours every time
4. 544.▲
   by notch898a 4y ago

   Don't need ESTA for guam / saipan. Wonder what happens if they board foreign carrier. Probably just get booted when they reach customs. Also as fucked up as it is US citizens end up on the TSC and no-fly as well. No ESTA needed
5. 545.▲
   by notch898a 4y ago

   It's a civil limitation AFAIK. Those on the no-fly can still buy a gun lol. Probably can charter your own flight as well or fly your own private plane.