notavalleyman

12 ms·

91.
by notavalleyman 3y ago
From what I understood from the OP link, the FBI are working closely with US attorneys on how to structure and sequence their cases. I really don't understand why you have theorised that a US attorney would allow attacks to take place.
92.
by notavalleyman 3y ago
The article which you linked, says the arrested people are accused of conducted scouting trips of the governor's house. The furthest that the guardian went, was saying their claims of an FBI setup were "not entirely outlandish&quo
93.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
> solving crimes It is a crime in the UK to send a malicious message contrary to that Act of parliament... > Why would they even need to interview him to determine if it was a crime or not? Lots of reasons to interview him, and you&#x
94.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
No, not right. UK is democratic and the elected reps' body is sovereign over law. An Iranian cannot stand for election in her region on the platform of: I am going to repeal "Islamic" law. A person can stand for election in t
95.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
> should be absolutely terrified of their government, because they've given their government the power to arrest them for literally no reason at all Would this opinion change if you learned that in the UK people are generally truste
96.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
You don't know that at all. For all you know, 99% are legitimate targeted harassment or part of a larger course of offending behaviour. It's snap uninformed judgements like yours that are the problem, imo
97.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
According the the person who reported a crime, it was...and that person has the right to be taken seriously
98.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
The question was - why is (this legislated behaviour) any of the government's business? That's not an opinion. Ultimately it's a question of consent and the social contract. My answer, which you're critical of here, is t
99.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
> Obviously the latter Not obvious at all. If you can explain to the cops why you found it offensive, it's conceivable to me that I'd be interviewed about it
100.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
Then I suggest you run for parliament in your constabulary. Because the current UK government is not making noises about changing this law.
101.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
> Do you think, the police response would be 100% identical Yes I absolutely do. Do you have some examples of the opposite to share?
102.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
One purpose of government in the UK is law writing, so the Communications Act 2003 is absolutely their business. As to why the behaviour needs legislating: because the British social contract required it, because in British society they&#x2
103.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
Yeah, this dude getting NFA'd marks the end of the first amendment in the UK. Wait why is everyone frowning at me
104.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
> the police have recorded over 100000 incidents I just think it's worth rebutting, that the police are not combing twitter for anything borderline. These are complaints that the public are making to the police. There is a relevant
105.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
I don't agree that that's what's happening. A law exists in the UK about using public communications networks to send grossly offensive or indecent communications. Somebody complained to the police that this chap had maybe br
106.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
Critics: "Crypto is useless, and you're all going to be left broke and sad." Proponents: Are left broke and sad. Author of this article: The critics are just "tricked into thinking they are were right all along, and they
107.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
Ok so keep fleshing out your idea. You believe that the state department, et al, are some of the secret rulers of the world, and they puppet the president. The president, both Trump and Biden, were puppeting the ... UK establishment. And th
108.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
Is that evidence that the leaders of the UK are puppets of the leaders of the USA?
109.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
So you're saying that Trump and Biden are part of the same "team" puppeting Boris Johnson, but Biden is the quieter one, from a European perspective... But if they're the same team, then why did Trump mind losing the ele
110.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
Why do you think that? The two most recent American administrations have been seemingly polar opposites. It would be weird for the UK PM, who has seen both POTUS, to have been a puppet of both of them
111.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
This is an emotively charged post, but it's factually wrong, and basically a conspiracy theory. Over 100% short interest doesn't imply anyone broke the law. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021
112.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
Dude if you can't see the connection between your weird comments about green hats and the stock price of the green hat companies, then I don't know what to say. It's as clear as day. You pretended it was all about baseball bu
113.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
> They literally said at 2:30 on the may report they will not raise the rates by 3/4ths. The exact second he said that the stock market went up 1 trillion. Today they raised it by 3/4ths You didn't provide any sources, but
114.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
> all economic theory and statistics that is controlling the biggest power decisions made with incredible wealth implications Yes, I think so. For many reasons. 1. People tend to have pride in their work and can typically be relied on to
115.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
The staff of the fed have degrees and doctorates in financial engineering and (for some) decades of experience in financial management. The Fed's governors are appointed by our voted representatives and are responsible to them. When th
116.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
Ok, an explicit conspiracy that the Jews are censoring the internet. You've said you think other governments are doing the same? But you're somehow sure that in this case, it's the Jews. Your post is a testament to a conspira
117.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
"connect the dots" you write, while refusing to do so. So let's see. You're saying that there's a secret conspiracy run by a Jewish organisation to remove donation buttons from media companies who criticise - not Ju
118.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
Uh. Yes, they do. Can you help me understand it, then. Why do you think the author felt the need to ask the ADL for comment on an article about "Consortium" and "Mint News"? There's an outright implication that the
119.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
Good. If you're going to start an outlet to shill fascist governments who commit genocide, I don't want to use the same payments company as you. Sounds like there are enough people with my view, that payments companies would rathe
120.
by notavalleyman 4y ago
I'm not even sure what you're asking, sorry. I don't think you can infer I'm in some bubble, or my head's in the sand, because I don't conclude from this article that we should scrap the official secrets act

More ›