4 ms·
You don't know that at all. For all you know, 99% are legitimate targeted harassment or part of a larger course of offending behaviour. It's snap uninformed jud
by notavalleyman 4y ago
You don't know that at all. For all you know, 99% are legitimate targeted harassment or part of a larger course of offending behaviour. It's snap uninformed judgements like yours that are the problem, imo
- throwaway0a5e 4y agoI might not know but it seems like a very fair default assumption given the history of anti-nuisance laws in meatspace.